Содержание
Перейти к:
Фенотипы предиабета: патогенез и последствия в рамках прогнозирования и профилактики сахарного диабета 2 типа и сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний
https://doi.org/10.14341/DM10376
Аннотация
Распространенность сахарного диабета 2-го типа (СД2) растет во всем мире. В связи с этим необходимо лучше понимать его патогенез, риск развития осложнений, ассоциированных с СД, и эффективные подходы к лечению. Поскольку СД2 представляет собой очень гетерогенное заболевание, обе стратегии фенотипирования, связанные с его патогенезом и риском осложнений, могут помочь разработать способы профилактики на основе индивидуального риска. Поскольку уже показано, что гипергликемическое состояние при предиабете ассоциировано с повышенным риском метаболического синдрома, необходимо исследовать влияние фенотипов на предсказательные и превентивные исходы уже в этом раннем состоянии гипергликемии. В этой обзорной статье обсуждается, как можно использовать важные фенотипы предиабета, такие как неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени, висцеральное ожирение, нарушение секреции инсулина и инсулинорезистентность, для улучшения прогнозирования и профилактики СД2 и сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний.
При поддержке: Публикация этой статьи была профинансирована Novartis Pharma AG, Базель, Швейцария.
Для цитирования:
Фенотипы предиабета: патогенез и последствия в рамках прогнозирования и профилактики сахарного диабета 2 типа и сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. Сахарный диабет. 2019;22(6):577-581. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM10376
For citation:
Stefan N. Phenotypes of prediabetes: pathogenesis and consequences for prediction and prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Diabetes mellitus. 2019;22(6):577-581. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM10376
The prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes is increasing world-wide. While in the United States and in China the prevalence of diabetes in adults amounted to 14% and 11%, respectively, the prevalence of prediabetes is thought to be as high as 38% and 36% (1,2).
Type 2 diabetes is associated with 2 to 4 times higher risks of death and cardiovascular events than the general population (3). Particularly the age-standardized incidence rate of first coronary heart disease is significantly higher in patients with than in patients without type 2 diabetes (4). Furthermore, in patients with type 1 diabetes the risk of death from any cause or from cardiovascular causes is twice as high as the risk for matched controls (5). Also in type 1 diabetes cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality. Similar to type 2 diabetes the strongest risk factors for cardiovascular disease and mortality for patients with type 1 diabetes are hyperglycaemia, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetic kidney disease, insulin resistance and obesity (6). Thus, early, safe and effective treatment of these risk factors helps to reduce mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in diabetes (7,8).
Presently there is critical discussion to what extent the hyperglycemic state of prediabetes represents a condition that already puts subjects at an increased risk of CVD (9). However, the epidemiological data clearly point to a high risk of cardiometabolic complications in prediabetes, that almost reached the level of complications presently observed in manifest diabetes (10,11). Prediabetes is a very heterogeneous metabolic state, both in respect to its pathogenesis and prediction of diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to better understand its pathophysiology and stratify the risk of prediabetes-associated diseases. In this respect applying precise anthropometric and metabolic phenotyping strategies in prediabetes may help to achieve this goal.
PHENOTYPES OF PREDIABETES AND THE RISK OF TYPE 2 DIABETES AND CVD
To investigate the role of the major parameters, not only predicting the incidence of diabetes and CVD in prediabetes, first they have to be identified among several risk parameters that were proposed during the last decades. Elegant studies performed in the Pima Indian population, which has the highest risk of type 2 diabetes on a population level, provided evidence that low insulin secretion and high insulin resistance independenty of each other predict increased risk of type 2 diabetes (12,13). Furthermore, increased visceral fat mass and increased liver fat content are associated with an elevated risk of diabetes and CVD (14,15).
The next question is: to what extent are these parameters independently of each other associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes and CVD? My colleagues and I could show in 2008 that NAFLD [determined by 1H-magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy] stronger than visceral obesity [determined by MR tomography (16)] associates with insulin resistance (17), a finding that was replicated by another group in 2009 (18). We also found that high liver fat content, but not high visceral fat mass, may explain the insulin resistance that is a ssociated with short adult stature (19). Furthermore, my collegues and I could show in 2011 that a higher liver fat content stronger than a high visceral fat mass, associates with the severity of prediabetes, determined as isolated impaired fasting glycemia (iIFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (iIGT) and IFG+IGT (20).
We also investigated the relationships of these phenotypes with the risk of CVD. We found that NAFLD, stronger than visceral obesity, and independently of insulin resistance, insulin secretion failure and the status prediabetes, associates with increased carotid intima-media thickness (21), an early marker of atherosclerosis. In addition, we investigated the relationship of NAFLD and visceral obesity with metabolically healthy obesity (22). We found that high liver fat content, stronger than high visceral fat mass, predicts the regression from a metabolically unhealthy obese to a metabolically healthy condition during lifestyle intervention-mediated weight-loss (23). In respect to metabolically unhealthy normal weight we found that low leg fat mass determines this condition stronger that NAFLD and visceral obesity in normal weight subjects and that NAFLD and visceral obesity become more relevant in metabolically unhealthy overweight and obesity (24).
PHENOTYPES OF PREDIABETES AND MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN THEIR CONTRIBUTION OF TYPE 2 DIAVBETES AND CVD
Increased visceral fat mass has extensively been studied regarding its contribution to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and CVD. In this respect particularly the concept of dysregulated adipokine and cytokine secretion from expanded visceral adipose tissue is well established (25-27). Regarding the contribution of NAFLD to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and CVD we have proposed the novel concept of dysregulated hepatokine secretion (Figure 1) (28). Among the most extensively studied hepatokines fetuin-A is increasingly released from NAFLD and is considered to promote insulin resistance, insulin secretion failure and subclinical inflammation and fetuin-A levels were found to predict incident type 2 diabetes and CVD (29-35).
Figure 1. If a positive energy balance and a sedentary lifestyle converge with a genetic risk, visceral obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) develop. Visceral obesity via increased lipolysis, subclinical inflammation and dysregulated release of adipokines and NAFLD via hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and dysregulated release of hepatokines induce insulin resistance, beta-cell dysfunction and atherosclerosis.
IMPLEMENTATION OF PHENOTYPES OF PREDIABETES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
In the Tübingen Lifestyle Intervention Program (TULIP) study, we investigated whether phenotypes of prediabetes can help to identify in subjects with prediabetes unique at-risk phenotypes that associate with the nonresponse to a 9 months structured lifestyle intervention in respect to restoration of normal glucose regulation (NGR). First, we found a large variability in the change of glycemia among the subjects that underwent the lifestyle intervention. Second, among baseline parameters that may predict reversal from prediabetes to NGR such as sex and the continuous baseline variables age, BMI, waist circumference, liver fat content, insulin sensitivity, 2hr glucose levels, fasting glucose levels and insulin secretion only impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistant NAFLD predicted a low chance for the restoration of NGR (Figure 2) (36). During the same lifestyle intervention we also found that NAFLD predicted a lower chance of subjects to revert from a metabolically unhealthy to a healthy phenotype, independently of the amount of weight loss.
Figure 2. Among the risk factors high body-mass index (BMI), high waist circumference, increased age, fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia, insulin resistance+NAFLD and insulin secretion failure, only the latter two predicted a low chance for a regression to normal glucose regulation in 120 subjects with prediabetes, who underwent a lifestyle intervention (36).
CONCLUSION
There is growing evidence that major phenotypes of prediabetes can be identified. They may not only be used to improve cardiometabolic risk stratification, but also to identify drug targets for pharmacological intervention and to tailor lifestyle intervention programs to prevent type 2 diabetes and CVD.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Source of funding. The publication of this article was supported by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Conflicts of Interests. NS received research grants, lecture or advisory board fees from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer, Eli Lilly, Genkyotex, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis Pharma AG, Novo Nordisk, Roche Pharma, Sanofi.
The article is based on the presentation by the author at Diabetes Scientific School “T2D patients’ journey: holistic approach and quality of life” held at Moscow (11–12 April 2019).
Authors contribution. Data collection and analysis: NS. Manuscript writing: NS.
Список литературы
1. Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, 1988−2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1021−1029. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10029
2. Wang L, Gao P, Zhang M, et al. Prevalence and ethnic pattern of diabetes and prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2515−2523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7596
3. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1407−1418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1608664
4. Avogaro A, Giorda C, Maggini M, et al. Incidence of coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetic men and women: impact of microvascular complications, treatment, and geographic location. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1241–1247. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2558
5. Lind M, Svensson AM, Kosiborod M, et al. Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(21):1972−1982. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408214
6. Bjornstad P, Donaghue KC, Maahs DM. Macrovascular disease and risk factors in youth with type 1 diabetes: time to be more attentive to treatment? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(10):809−820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30035-4
7. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, et al. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383−393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021778
8. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, et al. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):633−644. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800256
9. Piller C. Dubious diagnosis. Science. 2019;363(6431):1026−1031. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.363.6431.1026
10. Ali MK, Bullard KM, Saydah S, et al. Cardiovascular and renal burdens of prediabetes in the USA: analysis of data from serial cross-sectional surveys, 1988−2014. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(5):392−403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30027-5
11. Perreault L, Faerch K, Gregg EW. Can cardiovascular epidemiology and clinical trials close the risk management gap between diabetes and prediabetes? Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17(9):77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0899-7
12. Lillioja S, Mott DM, Spraul M, et al. Insulin resistance and insulin secretory dysfunction as precursors of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Prospective studies of Pima Indians. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1988−1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312303292703
13. Weyer C, Bogardus C, Mott DM, Pratley RE. The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(6):787−794. doi: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI7231
14. Neeland IJ, Ross R, Després JP, et al.; International Atherosclerosis Society; International Chair on Cardiometabolic Risk Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(9):715−725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30084-1
15. Stefan N, Häring HU, Cusi K. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: causes, diagnosis, cardiometabolic consequences, and treatment strategies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(4):313−324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30154-2
16. Stefan N, Ramsauer M, Jordan P, et al. Inhibition of 11β-HSD1 with RO5093151 for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(5):406−416. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70170-0
17. Stefan N, Kantartzis K, Machann J, et al. Identification and characterization of metabolically benign obesity in humans. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(15):1609−1616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1609
18. Fabbrini E, Magkos F, Mohammed BS, et al. Intrahepatic fat, not visceral fat, is linked with metabolic complications of obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(36):15430−15435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904944106
19. Stefan N, Häring HU, Hu FB, Schulze MB. Divergent associations of height with cardiometabolic disease and cancer: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and global implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(5):457−467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00474-X
20. Kantartzis K, Machann J, Schick F, et al. The impact of liver fat vs visceral fat in determining categories of prediabetes. Diabetologia. 2010;53(5):882−889. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-010-1663-6
21. Stefan N, Fritsche A, Schick F, Häring HU. Phenotypes of prediabetes and stratification of cardiometabolic risk. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(9):789−798. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00082-6
22. Stefan N, Häring HU, Hu FB, Schulze MB. Metabolically healthy obesity: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1(2):152−162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70062-7
23. Stefan N, Häring HU, Schulze MB. Metabolically healthy obesity: the low-hanging fruit in obesity treatment? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(3):249−258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30292-9
24. Stefan N, Schick F, Häring HU. Causes, characteristics, and consequences of metabolically unhealthy normal weight in humans. Cell Metab. 2017;26(2):292−300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.07.008
25. Tchernof A, Després JP. Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(1):359−404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00033.2011
26. Fasshauer M, Blüher M. Adipokines in health and disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015;36(7):461−470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2015.04.014
27. Scherer PE. The many secret lives of adipocytes: implications for diabetes. Diabetologia. 2019;62(2):223−232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4777-x
28. Stefan N, Häring HU. The role of hepatokines in metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9(3):144−152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.258
29. Stefan N, Fritsche A, Weikert C, et al. Plasma fetuin-A levels and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2008;57(10):2762−2767. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-0538
30. Ix JH, Wassel CL, Kanaya AM, et al.; Health ABC Study. Fetuin-A and incident diabetes mellitus in older persons. JAMA. 2008;300(2):182−188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.2.182
31. Weikert C, Stefan N, Schulze MB, et al. Plasma fetuin-a levels and the risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Circulation. 2008;118(24):2555−2562. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814418
32. Pal D, Dasgupta S, Kundu R, et al. Fetuin-A acts as an endogenous ligand of TLR4 to promote lipid-induced insulin resistance. Nat Med. 2012;18(8):1279−1285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2851
33. Stefan N, Häring HU. Circulating fetuin-A and free fatty acids interact to predict insulin resistance in humans. Nat Med. 2013;19(4):394−395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3116
34. Stefan N, Schick F, Häring HU. Ectopic fat in insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and cardiometabolic disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2236−2237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1412427
35. Gerst F, Wagner R, Kaiser G, et al. Metabolic crosstalk between fatty pancreas and fatty liver: effects on local inflammation and insulin secretion. Diabetologia. 2017;60(11):2240−2251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4385-1
36. Stefan N, Staiger H, Wagner R, et al. A high-risk phenotype associates with reduced improvement in glycaemia during a lifestyle intervention in prediabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;58(12):2877−2884. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3760-z
Об авторе
Norbert Stefan
University Hospital Tübingen; Institute of Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD)
Германия
Конфликт интересов:
Германия
Конфликт интересов:
NS получил гранты на научно-исследовательскую работу, оплату выступления и консультирования от Astra Zeneca, Boehringer, Eli Lilly, Genkyotex, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis Pharma AG, Novo Nordisk, Roche Pharma, Sanofi.
Дополнительные файлы
|
|
1. Рис. 1. Роль висцерального ожирения и неалькогольной жировой болезни печени (НАЖБ) в патогенезе сахарного диабета 2 типа и сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний (концепция неуправляемого синтеза адипокинов и гепатокинов). | |
| Тема | ||
| Тип | Прочее | |
Посмотреть
(308KB)
|
Метаданные ▾ | |
|
|
2. Рис. 2. Параметры прогнозирования возврата от предиабетического состояния к нормальной регуляции гликемии (НРГ) [36]. | |
| Тема | ||
| Тип | Прочее | |
Посмотреть
(334KB)
|
Метаданные ▾ | |
|
|
3. Figure 1. If a positive energy balance and a sedentary lifestyle converge with a genetic risk, visceral obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) develop. Visceral obesity via increased lipolysis, subclinical inflammation and dysregulated release of adipokines and NAFLD via hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and dysregulated release of hepatokines induce insulin resistance, beta-cell dysfunction and atherosclerosis. | |
| Тема | ||
| Тип | Прочее | |
Посмотреть
(274KB)
|
Метаданные ▾ | |
|
|
4. Figure 2. Among the risk factors high body-mass index (BMI), high waist circumference, increased age, fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia, insulin resistance+NAFLD and insulin secretion failure, only the latter two predicted a low chance for a regression to normal glucose regulation in 120 subjects with prediabetes, who underwent a lifestyle intervention (36). | |
| Тема | ||
| Тип | Прочее | |
Посмотреть
(311KB)
|
Метаданные ▾ | |
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Фенотипы предиабета: патогенез и последствия в рамках прогнозирования и профилактики сахарного диабета 2 типа и сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. Сахарный диабет. 2019;22(6):577-581. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM10376
For citation:
Stefan N. Phenotypes of prediabetes: pathogenesis and consequences for prediction and prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Diabetes mellitus. 2019;22(6):577-581. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM10376
Просмотров:
1836
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Послать статью по эл. почте 
