Immunogenetic–metabolic profiles in clinically healthy siblings of patients with type 1 diabetes
https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13469
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinically healthy siblings of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) exhibit immunogenetic and metabolic heterogeneity, which limits the accuracy of individual risk assessment when single markers are used. Integration of HLA risk, islet autoantibody (AAb) status, and metabolic parameters may improve identification of the preclinical stages of T1D.
AIM: To identify immunogenetic-metabolic profiles among clinically healthy siblings of patients with T1D based on the integration of HLA risk, AAb status, and metabolic parameters, and to assess their potential role in characterizing the preclinical stage of the disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 420 participants: 254 patients with newly diagnosed T1D (aged 0–17 years) and 166 of their healthy siblings. AAb (IAA, GADA, IA-2A, ZnT8A, ICA), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and C-peptide were measured, and HLA typing of class II loci (HLA-DR and HLA-DQ) was performed. Immunogenetic-metabolic profiles were identified using two-step cluster analysis. Statistical analyses included nonparametric tests, χ² test, logistic regression, ROC analysis, and event-free survival analysis (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Among the 166 siblings, two-step cluster analysis (silhouette measure 0.49) identified four immunogenetic-metabolic profiles: isolated genetic (21%) — high HLA risk without autoantibodies or metabolic abnormalities; early autoimmune (22%) — ≥1 autoantibody and high HLA risk without significant metabolic changes; metabolic (27%) — absence of autoantibodies, reduced C-peptide, and predominance of low/intermediate HLA risk; and combined (31%) — ≥1 autoantibody, HbA1c ≥5.4% in 100%, reduced C-peptide < 0.54 ng/mL in 24%, and high HLA risk in 59%. During 7.1 years of follow-up, T1D developed in 4.2% of siblings and was numerically more frequent in the combined profile (7.8%) without statistically significant differences . A significant linear trend was observed for increasing frequencies of IA-2A, ZnT8A, and GADA toward T1D onset (p < 0.001). ZnT8A were an independent predictor of belonging to the combined profile. The median number of autoantibody types was higher at T1D onset (3 vs 0; p=0.006). Inclusion of reduced C-peptide was associated with improved discriminative performance of the model (AUC=0.857).
CONCLUSION: Distinct immunogenetic-metabolic profiles were identified in clinically healthy siblings of patients with T1D based on the combination of HLA risk, AAb status, and metabolic parameters. The profile characterized by concurrent autoimmune activity and reduced β-cell functional reserve was characterized by a higher frequency of T1D onset.
About the Authors
K. G. KornevaRussian Federation
Kseniya G. Korneva, MD, PhD, Associate Professor
10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, 603000 Nizhny Novgorod
Competing Interests:
none
O. B. Bezlepkina
Russian Federation
Olga B. Bezlepkina, MD, PhD, Professor
Moscow
Competing Interests:
none
L. G. Strongin
Russian Federation
Leonid G. Strongin, MD, PhD, Professor
Nizhny Novgorod
Competing Interests:
none
E. V. Kolbasina
Russian Federation
Elena V. Kolbasina, MD
Nizhny Novgorod
Competing Interests:
none
M. V. Budylina
Russian Federation
Marina V. Budylina, MD, PhD
Cheboksary
Competing Interests:
none
N. V. Makeeva
Russian Federation
Nataiya V. Makeeva, MD
Yoshkar-Ola
Competing Interests:
none
References
1. Insel RA, Dunne JL, Atkinson MA, et al. Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(10):1964–1974. doi: https://doi.org10.2337/dc15-1419
2. Ziegler AG, Rewers M, Simell O, et al. Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2473–2479. doi: https://doi.org10.1001/jama.2013.6285
3. Stene LC, Norris JM, Rewers MJ. Risk factors for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes in America [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); 2023 [cited 2026 Mar 1]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36998057
4. Redondo MJ, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Gaulton KJ. Genetics of type 1 diabetes. In: Lawrence JM, Casagrande SS, Herman WH, Wexler DJ, Cefalu WT, editors. Diabetes in America [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); 2023 [cited 2026 Mar 1]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38117927
5. Urrutia I, Martinez R, Calvo B, et al. Collaborative Working Group. Risk for progression to type 1 diabetes in first-degree relatives under 50 years of age. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1411686. doi: https://doi.org10.3389/fendo.2024.1411686
6. Ziegler AG, Pflueger M, Winkler C, et al. Accelerated progression from islet autoimmunity to diabetes is causing the escalating incidence of type 1 diabetes in young children. J Autoimmun. 2011;37(1):3–7. doi: https://doi.org10.1016/j.jaut.2011.02.004.
7. Felton JL, Redondo MJ, Oram RA, et al. ADA/EASD PMDI. Islet autoantibodies as precision diagnostic tools to characterize heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Commun Med (Lond). 2024;4(1):66. doi: https://doi.org10.1038/s43856-024-00478-y
8. Evans-Molina C, Dor Y, Lernmark Å, et al. The heterogeneity of type 1 diabetes: implications for pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment — 2024 Diabetes, Diabetes Care, and Diabetologia Expert Forum. Diabetologia. 2025;68(9):1859–1878. doi: https://doi.org10.1007/s00125-025-06462-y
9. You L, Ferrat LA, Oram RA, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group. Identification of type 1 diabetes risk phenotypes using an outcomeguided clustering analysis. Diabetologia. 2024;67(11):2507–2517. doi: https://doi.org10.1007/s00125-024-06246-w
10. Joglekar MV, Kaur S, Pociot F, Hardikar AA. Prediction of progression to type 1 diabetes with dynamic biomarkers and risk scores. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12(7):483–492. doi: https://doi.org10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00103-7
11. Bonifacio E, Ziegler AG. Type 1 diabetes risk factors, risk prediction and presymptomatic detection: evidence and guidance for screening. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;27(Suppl 6):28–39. doi: https://doi.org10.1111/dom.16354
12. Galderisi A, Bonet J, Ismail HM, et al. Metabolic phenotype of stage 1 and stage 2 type 1 diabetes using modeling of β-cell function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025;110(11):3168–3178. doi: https://doi.org10.1210/clinem/dgaf086
13. Romanenkova EM, Zufarova YM, Sorokin DY, et al. Islet autoantibodies and residual beta-cell function in children with type 1 diabetes depending on age of manifestation. Diabetes Mellitus. 2023;26(3):204–212. doi: https://doi.org10.14341/DM12955 (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org10.14341/DM12955
14. Vehik K, Boulware D, Killian M, et al. TEDDY Study Group. Rising hemoglobin A1c in the nondiabetic range predicts progression of type 1 diabetes as well as oral glucose tolerance tests. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(10):2342–2349. doi: https://doi.org10.2337/dc22-0828
15. Salami F, Tamura R, You L, et al. TEDDY Study Group. HbA1c as a time predictive biomarker for an additional islet autoantibody and type 1 diabetes in seroconverted TEDDY children. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1586–1593. doi: https://doi.org10.1111/pedi.13413
16. Sims EK, Cuthbertson D, Ferrat LA, et al. IA-2A positivity increases risk of progression within and across established stages of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2025;68(5):993–1004. doi: https://doi.org10.1007/s00125-025-06382-x
Supplementary files
|
|
1. Рисунок 1. ROC-кривые логистических моделей прогноза клинического дебюта сахарного диабета 1 типа. | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(263KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Korneva K.G., Bezlepkina O.B., Strongin L.G., Kolbasina E.V., Budylina M.V., Makeeva N.V. Immunogenetic–metabolic profiles in clinically healthy siblings of patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes mellitus. 2026;29(3):213-221. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13469
JATS XML
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).








































