Comparative evaluation of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA neuroprotective properties in type 2 diabetic patients
https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13255
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic brain dyscirculation (CBD) is a common type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) complication that leads to the cognitive dysfunction. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) can reduce the stroke risk but their effect on CBD is not fully studied.
AIM: To study and to compare the effect of SGLT-2i of various selectivity and GLP-1RA on the biochemical and functional parameters of CNS damage in patients with type 2 DM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Type 2 diabetic patients with target HbA1c level on metformin monotherapy were included in “MET” group (n=43), with non-target HbA1c were divided into groups: “MET+EMPA”, n=47, (empagliflozin therapy), “MET+CANA”, n=41, (canagliflozin therapy), “MET+GLP-1RA”, n=66 (therapy with injectable GLP-1RA). The “Control” group (n=23) consisted of healthy volunteers. In “Control” and “MET” groups at baseline, in the rest groups also after 3 and 6 months neuron-specific enolase (NSE), neurofilament light chains (NLC) levels and cognitive status were determined.
RESULTS: NSE was increased in all DM patients. GLP-1RA therapy did not lead to NSE decrease. NSE decreased in “MET+EMPA” group after 3 months and in “MET+CANA” group after 6 months. NLC levels were elevated in patients with non-target HbA1c compared to “Control”. Both SGLT-2i caused a more pronounced decrease in LCN than GLP-1RA after 3 months; after 6 months NLC in all treatment groups did not differ from “Control” group. At baseline all DM patients had impaired cognitive function according to MOCA and MMSE. Empagliflozin treatment resulted in the improvement, but not normalization, of cognitive status by MOCA scale. Canagliflozin led to cognitive function normalization after 3 months and retention of the effect. GLP-1RA use was associated with mental function normalization after 6 months. Satisfactory glycemic control was achieved in all groups.
CONCLUSION: Type 2 DM is characterized by CNS damage even with satisfactory glycemic control. GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i have a protective effect in CBD in DM; the protective potential of low-selective canagliflozin is probably more pronounced, as it manifests in biochemical and functional parameters improvement. The neurotropic effect of GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i is not due solely to their effect on the glycemic profile.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. MurashevaRussian Federation
Anna V. Murasheva, MD, PhD
2 Akkuratova street, 197341 Saint-Petersburg
ResearcherID: AAG-9468-2020;
Scopus Author ID: 55418812500
T. L. Karonova
Russian Federation
Tatiana L. Karonova, MD, PhD, Professor
Saint-Petersburg
ResearcherID: V-7179-2018;
Scopus Author ID: 56953234200
O. S. Fuks
Russian Federation
Oksana S. Fuks, MD
Saint-Petersburg
ResearcherID: HMV-2293-2023;
Scopus Author ID: 57226561049
N. V. Timkina
Russian Federation
Natalya V. Timkina, MD
Saint-Petersburg
ResearcherID: ABG-3536-2021;
Scopus Author ID: 57222553770
A. D. Fedotova
Russian Federation
Arina D. Fedotova
Saint-Petersburg
E. N. Grineva
Russian Federation
Elena N. Grineva, MD, PhD, Professor, Corresponding member of Russian Academy of Sciences
Saint-Petersburg
ResearcherID: V-8221-2018;
Scopus Author ID: 6507138145
E. V. Shlyakhto
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Shlyakhto, MD, PhD, professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences
Saint-Petersburg
ResearcherID: A-6939-2014;
Scopus Author ID: 16317213100
References
1. Carrillo-Larco RM, Guzman-Vilca WC, Xu X, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Mean age and body mass index at type 2 diabetes diagnosis: Pooled analysis of 56 health surveys across income groups and world regions. Diabet Med. 2024;41(2):e15174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15174
2. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Vikulova OK, et al. Diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation: dynamics of epidemiological indicators according to the Federal Register of Diabetes Mellitus for the period 2010–2022. Diabetes mellitus. 2023;26(2):104-123. (In Russ). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13035
3. Tang H, Zhang S, Yan S, et al. Unfavorable neurological outcome in diabetic patients with acute ischemic stroke is associated with incomplete recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(4):342-346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011643
4. Cao F, Yang F, Li J, et al. The relationship between diabetes and the dementia risk: a meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024;16(1):101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01346-4
5. Roy B, Ehlert L, Mullur R, et al. Regional Brain Gray Matter Changes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9925. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67022-5
6. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Mayorov AYu, et al. Standards of Specialized Diabetes Care / Edited by Dedov I, Shestakova M, Mayorov A. 11th Edition. Diabetes mellitus. 2023;26(2S):1-157. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13042
7. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, et al. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2753-2786. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dci22-0034
8. Giugliano D, Scappaticcio L, Longo M, Bellastella G, Esposito K. GLP-1 receptor agonists vs. SGLT-2 inhibitors: the gap seems to be leveling off. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01400-9
9. Bellastella G, Maiorino MI, Longo M, et al. GlucagonLike Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Prevention of Stroke Systematic Review of Cardiovascular Outcome Trials With Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2020;51(2):666-669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027557
10. Li HL, Lip GYH, Feng Q, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and cardiac arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published correction appears in Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Sep 4;20(1):177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01371-x.]. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01293-8
11. Testa R, Bonfigli AR, Prattichizzo F, La Sala L, De Nigris V, Ceriello A. The «Metabolic Memory» Theory and the Early Treatment of Hyperglycemia in Prevention of Diabetic Complications. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):437. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9050437
12. Varghese SM, Joy N, John AM, George G, Chandy GM, Benjamin AI. Sweet Memories or Not? A Comparative Study on Cognitive Impairment in Diabetes Mellitus. Front Public Health. 2022;10:822062. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.822062
13. Ma H, Lin YH, Dai LZ, Lin CS, Huang Y, Liu SY. Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/ obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13(3):e061807. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061807
14. Yu AS, Hirayama BA, Timbol G, et al. Functional expression of SGLTs in rat brain. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;299(6):C1277-C1284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00296.2010
15. Simanenkova AV, Fuks OS, Timkina NV, et al. Highly selective sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitor empagliflozin as means of brain protection in conditions of chronic brain dyscirculation. Problems of Endocrinology. 2024;70(4):44-56. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13336
16. Simanenkova AV, Fuks ОS, Timkina NV, et al. An experimental study of the neuroprotective effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors. Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology. 2022;58(5):1540-1553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093022050234
17. Pawlos A, Broncel M, Woźniak E, Gorzelak-Pabiś P. Neuroprotective Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors. Molecules. 2021;26(23):7213. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237213
18. Shin A, Koo BK, Lee JY, Kang EH. Risk of dementia after initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in adults aged 40-69 years with type 2 diabetes: population based cohort study [published correction appears in BMJ. 2024 Sep 2;386:q1911. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1911.]. BMJ. 2024;386:e079475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079475
19. Vadini F, Simeone PG, Boccatonda A, et al. Liraglutide improves memory in obese patients with prediabetes or early type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020;44(6):1254-1263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0535-5
20. Nørgaard CH, Friedrich S, Hansen CT, et al. Treatment with glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists and incidence of dementia: Data from pooled double-blind randomized controlled trials and nationwide disease and prescription registers. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022;8(1):e12268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12268
21. Simanenkova A, Fuks O, Timkina N, et al. Microglia Involvement into Acute and Chronic Brain Damage in Diabetic Rats: Impact of GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2024;29(7):265. doi: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2907265
Supplementary files
|
1. Рисунок 1. Динамика маркеров нейронального повреждения на фоне терапии ингибиторами натрий-глюкозного котранспортера 2 типа или агонистами рецепторов глюкагоноподобного пептида-1. (А) Динамика концентрации нейрон-специфической енолазы. (Б) Динамика концентрации легких цепей нейрофиламента. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(530KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
2. Рисунок 2. Динамика параметров когнитивного статуса на фоне терапии ингибиторами натрий-глюкозного котранспортера 2 типа или агонистами рецепторов глюкагоноподобного пептида-1. (А) Данные по Монреальской шкале когнитивной оценки (МОСА). (Б) Данные по Краткой шкале оценки психического статуса (MMSE). | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(535KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Murasheva A.V., Karonova T.L., Fuks O.S., Timkina N.V., Fedotova A.D., Grineva E.N., Shlyakhto E.V. Comparative evaluation of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA neuroprotective properties in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes mellitus. 2025;28(2):187-197. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13255

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).