Ethnic characteristics of bone remodeling in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12795
Abstract
Background: Structural and metabolic disorders of bone tissue in women with T2DM have no clinical manifestations, but they are accompanied by the risk of fractures.
Aim: To study the parameters of bone metabolism, BMD and microarchitectonics in female patients with T2DM in the Buryat population.
Materials and methods: The observational single-center one-stage controlled study included 73 women with T2DM, which were divided into 2 groups depending on the functional state of the ovaries (reproductive and postmenopausal periods). In each group, subgroups of the Buryat and Russian populations were identified. The first group included 34 patients with T2DM of the reproductive period: 16 from the Buryat population and 18 from the Russian population. The second group consisted of 39 postmenopausal patients with T2DM: 17 from the Buryat population and 22 from the Russian population. The study of BMD in the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck (Neck), in the proximal femur (Total hip), trabecular bone score (TBS), serum osteocalcin (OC), N-terminal propeptide type 1 procollagen was carried out (P1NP), vitamin D 25 (OH), blood plasma type I collagen C-terminal telopeptide (β-Cross laps) and ionized calcium (iCa).
Results: In female patients with T2DM of the reproductive age of the Buryat population, an increase in both markers of osteosynthesis P1NP (p=0.035), OC (p=0.047), and bone resorption β-Cross laps (p=0.040) was found relative to the similar group of the Russian population. In women with T2DM in the postmenopausal period of the Buryat population, there was also an increase in P1NP (p = 0.016), OC (p = 0.048), β-Cross laps (p = 0.020) compared with the group of postmenopausal women in the Russian population. Structural disorders, characterized by a decrease in TBS, were detected only in the postmenopausal period in female patients of the Buryat population compared to women in the Russian population (p = 0.029).
Comparative analysis among women with T2DM of the Buryat population, depending on the functional state of the ovaries, showed that activation of bone remodeling with an increase in P1NP (p = 0.019), OC (p = 0.004) and β-Cross laps (p = 0.004) is characteristic of postmenopausal women accompanied by a decrease in BMD Neck (p = 0.006), BMD Total hip (p = 0.003), BMD L1-L4 (p = 0.049) and TBS (p = 0.020) relative to female patients with T2DM in the reproductive period.
Conclusion: In women with T2DM in the Buryat population, both in the reproductive and postmenopausal periods, an increase in bone remodeling markers and BMD stability was found when compared with the corresponding groups of patients in the Russian population. The postmenopausal period was characterized by an additional decrease in TBS in patients with T2DM in the Buryat population relative to women in the Russian population.
About the Authors
T. P. BardymovaRussian Federation
Tatiana P. Bardymova - MD, PhD, Professor; eLibrary SPIN: 6151-1430.
664049, Irkutsk, mkr. Jubilejny, 100
Competing Interests:
not
M. V. Shestakova
Russian Federation
Marina V. Shestakova - MD, PhD, Professor; eLibrary SPIN: 7584-7015.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
not
Ya. P. Sandakov
Russian Federation
Yakov P. Sandakov; eLibrary SPIN: 8133-1812
Competing Interests:
not
M. V. Mistiakov
Russian Federation
Maksim V. Mistiakov; eLibrary SPIN: 6430-3185
Competing Interests:
not
M. V. Berezina
Russian Federation
Marina V. Berezina; eLibrary SPIN: 8697-1264
Competing Interests:
not
References
1. Yalochkina TO, Belaya JE, Rozhinskaya LY, et al. Bone fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: prevalence and risk factors. Diabetes mellitus. 2016; 19(5):359-365. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/dm7796
2. Ross PD, Knowlton W. Rapid bone loss is associated with increased levels of biochemical markers. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(2):297-302. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.2.297
3. Schousboe JT, Bauer DC, Nyman JA, et al. Potential for bone turnover markers to cost-effectively identify and select post-menopausal osteopenic women at high risk of fracture for bisphosphonate therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(2):201-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0218-7
4. Vestergaard P. Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes--a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(4):427-444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0253-4
5. Dedov II, Mel’nichenko GA, Belaia ZE, et al. Osteoporosis: from a rare symptom of endocrine diseases to the tacit epidemic of XX-XXI centuries. Problems of Endocrinology. 2011;57(1):35-45. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/probl201157135-45
6. de Liefde II, van der Klift M, de Laet CE, et al. Bone mineral density and fracture risk in type-2 diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1713-1720. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1909-1
7. Yan L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J, et al. Does hip strength analysis explain the lower incidence of hip fracture in the People’s Republic of China? Bone. 2004;34(3):584-588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.005
8. Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, et al. Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(2):185-194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.041007
9. Ballane G, Cauley JA, Luckey MM, El-Hajj Fuleihan G. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(5):1531-1542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3909-3
10. Leslie WD, Aubry-Rozier B, Lamy O, Hans D. TBS (Trabecular Bone Score) and Diabetes-Related Fracture Risk. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2013;98(2):602-609. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3118
11. Jackuliak P, Payer J. Corrigendum to «Osteoporosis, Fractures, and Diabetes». Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:2846080. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2846080
12. Ferrari SL, Abrahamsen B, Napoli N, et al. Diagnosis and management of bone fragility in diabetes: an emerging challenge. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(12):2585-2596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4650-2
13. Brandi ML. Microarchitecture, the key to bone quality. Rheumatology. 2009;48(Suppl 4):iv3−8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kep273
14. Ulivieri FM, Silva BC, Sardanelli F, et al. Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis. Endocrine. 2014;47(2):435−448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0280-4
15. Link TM, Majumdar S. Current diagnostic techniques in the evaluation of bone architecture. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2004;2(2):47−52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-004-0003-5
16. Ross PD, Knowlton W. Rapid bone loss is associated with increased levels of biochemical markers. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(2):297-302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.2.297
17. Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. Markers of bone turnover predict postmenopausal forearm bone loss over 4 years: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res. 1999; 14(9):1614-1621. doi: https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.9.1614
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Bardymova T.P., Shestakova M.V., Sandakov Ya.P., Mistiakov M.V., Berezina M.V. Ethnic characteristics of bone remodeling in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus. 2021;24(5):427-432. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12795

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).