Preview

Diabetes mellitus

Advanced search

Multidisciplinary lifestyle management approach in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in real clinical practice. Results of application “Life is easy” programme in Russia

https://doi.org/10.14341/DM10001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a disease with high medical and social impact due to its wide and ever-increasing prevalence, high hospitalization and mortality rates. Despite the whole range of therapeutic options, lifestyle intervention remains as important as ever since it underlies guidelines of T2DM management.


AIMS: To evaluate the effect of intensive lifestyle management approach on body weight reduction and on long-term maintenance of the achieved results in patients with T2DM.


MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed multicenter, interventional, prospective, non-randomized 12 month study. One hundred thirty overweight (obese) patients with T2DM included in the study were divided into two groups: group of lifestyle intervention (n=100) and control group (n=30). Patients in the group of lifestyle intervention participated in the intensive lifestyle modification and body weight reduction programme, which consisted of components: change in diet plan, physical exercise programme, cognitive behavioral techniques, educational and medical support. Clinical assessment and completing of patient questionnaires were performed at baseline, after 3 and 12 months. Patients in the control group did not attend programme, their clinical data were recorded during clinical visits every 3 months.


RESULTS: Ninety patients (90%) in the group of lifestyle intervention and twenty nine patients (96.7%) in the control group completed the study and fulfilled protocol. After 12 months, patients in the group of lifestyle intervention lost 5.8% of their baseline weight and patients in the control group showed 1.2% decrease of their baseline weight. Body weight loss ≥5% was observed in 49.2% of patients in the group of lifestyle intervention and in 12.9% of patients in the control group (OR=6.54 [2.01; 21.33]; р=0.002). By the end of observation, delta reduction of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in the intervention group was higher than in the control group (0.79% and 0.11%, respectively), the odds ratio for lowering HbA1c >0.5% from baseline between two groups was 14.10 [3.24; 61.30] (p<0.001) in favor of the group of lifestyle intervention. 58.3% patients in the group of lifestyle intervention with baseline level of HbA1c >7% (n=48) achieved a HbA1c target of ≤7%; in the control group two patients (13.3%) out of fifteen with baseline level of HbA1c >7% achieved the target after 3 months and returned to baseline by the end of observation.


CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the programme of intensive lifestyle modification in patients with T2DM is highly efficient and safe.

About the Authors

Svetlana I. Motkova

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, research associate



Larisa V. Savelyeva

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD



Larisa M. Rudina

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration


Russian Federation

PhD in psychology



Maria V. Gurkina

Medical Rehabilitation Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD



Elena V. Surkova

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD



Farida V. Valeeva

Kazan State Medical University


Russian Federation

MD, PhD, Professor



Gagik R. Galstyan

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD, Professor



Marina V. Shestakova

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD, Professor



References

1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF atlas. 8th ed. Brussels: IDF; 2017.

2. Lau DC, Teoh H. Impact of Current and Emerging Glucose-Lowering Drugs on Body Weight in Type 2 Diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39 Suppl 5:S148-154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.09.090

3. Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1983;67(5):968-977. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.67.5.968

4. Дедов И.И., Мельниченко Г.А., Романцова Т.И. Патогенетические аспекты ожирения // Ожирение и метаболизм. – 2004. – Т. 1. – №1. – С. 3-9. [Dedov II, Melnichenko GA, Romantsova TI. Patogeneticheskiye aspekty ozhireniya. Obesity and metabolism. 2004;1(1):3-9. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/2071-8713-5172

5. Colosia AD, Palencia R, Khan S. Prevalence of hypertension and obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in observational studies: a systematic literature review. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013;6:327-338. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S51325

6. Moyer VA, Force USPST. Screening for and management of obesity in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(5):373-378. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00475

7. Carvajal R, Wadden TA, Tsai AG, et al. Managing obesity in primary care practice: a narrative review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1281:191-206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12004

8. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(S1).

9. Wing RR, Lang W, Wadden TA, et al. Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1481-1486. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-2415

10. Mitri J, Hamdy O. Diabetes medications and body weight. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2009;8(5):573-584. doi: https://doi.org/10.1517/14740330903081725

11. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Майоров А.Ю., и др. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. / Под ред. Дедова И.И., Шестаковой М.В., Майорова А.Ю. – 8-й выпуск // Сахарный диабет. – 2017. – Т. 20. – №1S. – C. 1-121. [Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Mayorov AY, et al. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Mayorov AY, editors. Standards of specialized diabetes care. 8th edition. Diabetes mellitus. 2017;20(1S):1-121. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM20171S8

12. Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2018;61(12):2461-2498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5

13. Lindstrom J, Louheranta A, Mannelin M, et al. The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS): Lifestyle intervention and 3-year results on diet and physical activity. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(12):3230-3236. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.12.3230

14. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(12):2165-2171. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165

15. Steven S, Hollingsworth KG, Al-Mrabeh A, et al. Very Low-Calorie Diet and 6 Months of Weight Stability in Type 2 Diabetes: Pathophysiological Changes in Responders and Nonresponders. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(5):808-815. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1942

16. Look ARG. Eight-year weight losses with an intensive lifestyle intervention: the look AHEAD study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(1):5-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20662

17. Pi-Sunyer FX. Weight loss in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1526-1527. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.6.1526

18. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837-853. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07019-6

19. Hill JO, Wyatt H. Outpatient management of obesity: a primary care perspective. Obes Res. 2002;10 Suppl 2:124S-130S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2002.205

20. Hamdy O. Diabetes Weight Management in Clinical Practice—The Why WAIT Model. US Endocrinol. 2008;04(02):49. doi: https://doi.org/10.17925/use.2008.04.2.49

21. Hamdy O, Goebel-Fabbri A, Carver C, et al. Why WAIT Program: A Novel Model for Diabetes Weight Management in Routine Clinical Practice. Obes Manag 2008;4(4):176-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/obe.2008.0206

22. Hamdy O, Morsi A, Adel-Mottalib A, et al. Long-Term Effects of Lifestyle Intervention on Weight and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes in Real World Clinical Practice: 4-Year Longitudinal Results. In: Proceedings of the 72nd Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association; 2012 Jun 8-12, Philadelphia.

23. Clinicaltrials.gov [Internet]. Interventional Study of Active Weight Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity in Routine Clinical Practice During 12 Months [cited 2019 Jun 4]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02670928.

24. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-381.

25. Baum A, Scarpa J, Bruzelius E, et al. Targeting weight loss interventions to reduce cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes: a machine learning-based post-hoc analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects in the Look AHEAD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(10):808-815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30176-6


Supplementary files

1. SUPPLEMENT 1. Novartis company questionnaire for hypoglycemia assessing (with frequency of episodes)
Subject
Type Результаты исследования
Download (41KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
2. SUPPLEMENT 2. Rating of perceived exertion. Borg scale
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
Download (23KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
3. Fig. 1. Design research.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (70KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
4. Fig. 2. Dynamics of weight loss in patients of the intervention group, including those who reached the primary endpoint (body weight reduction ≥5%), for the first 3 months of classes (average [95% confidence interval]).
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (225KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
5. Fig. 3. Dynamics of body weight during the study (average [95% confidence interval]).
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (177KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
6. Fig. 4. Dynamics of the HbA1c level during the study (average [95% confidence interval]): HbA1c - glycated hemoglobin.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (162KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
7. Fig. 5. The structure of the distribution of therapy on the effect on body weight in patients from the intervention group who reached the primary endpoint before and after the study: Met - metformin, PSM - sulfonylurea derivatives, aGPP-1 - glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, iDPP- 4 - dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, INHPL-2 - sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors ..
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (219KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
8. SUPPLEMENT 1. Novartis company questionnaire for hypoglycemia assessing (with frequency of episodes)
Subject
Type Research Instrument
Download (41KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
9. SUPPLEMENT 2. Rating of perceived exertion. Borg scale
Subject
Type Research Instrument
Download (23KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Motkova S.I., Savelyeva L.V., Rudina L.M., Gurkina M.V., Surkova E.V., Valeeva F.V., Galstyan G.R., Shestakova M.V. Multidisciplinary lifestyle management approach in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in real clinical practice. Results of application “Life is easy” programme in Russia. Diabetes mellitus. 2019;22(2):115-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM10001

Views: 1872


ISSN 2072-0351 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0378 (Online)