Preview

Diabetes mellitus

Advanced search

Insulin resistance and its possible personal stress moderators

https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-5844

Abstract

Background. Recently, insulin resistance (IR) has been actively investigated by experts in various fields. Here we aim to study the effect of stress on the development of IR.


Objective. To study the associations between IR and personal stress moderators (self-attitude, locus of control and coping strategies) as well as the related performance lifestyles.


Methods. The study included 63 patients (16 men; mean age, 48.2 ± 11.7 years). Of these participants, 26 were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 10 with impaired glucose tolerance, 6 with impaired fasting glucose and 21 with normal glucose tolerance. The levels of HbA1c and IR ratio were determined using HOMA. Well-known psychological assessment questionnaires were used to assess the effect of personal stress moderators.


Results. There was a significant relationship between IR and personal stress moderators. A positive self-attitude was associated with a lower risk of IR (p < 0.05), which can be explained by a decrease in the risk of developing stress. Assertive coping strategies were most pronounced in subjects with a low level of IR (p < 0.05). Personal characteristics also determined an individual’s lifestyle, which may have an impact on the increase in IR. There was an association between high levels of IR and unhealthy alimentary preferences (p < 0.05). Such preferences were also associated with personal characteristics, such as external locus of control, less positive self-attitude and passive coping strategies (p < 0.05). People with high IR rarely engage in a regular physical activity; there was a direct correlation between the frequency of physical activity and assertive coping strategies (p < 0.01). Married participants had high levels of IR (p < 0.05).


Conclusion. There were significant relationships between IR and personal stress moderators, such as self-attitude and coping strategies. Besides the direct effects on stress levels, personality traits may also indirectly increase the risk of IR by influencing the individual’s lifestyle. There is a need to investigate the fact that married people have higher levels of IR.

About the Authors

Oleg G. Motovilin

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

PhD in Psychological sciences, leading research associate, associate professor


Competing Interests:

No interests conflict



Elena V. Surkova

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD, chief research associate


Competing Interests:

No interests conflict



Alexander Y. Mayorov

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD


Competing Interests:

No interests conflict



Ekaterina O. Koksharova

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD candidate


Competing Interests:

No interests conflict



Olga G. Melnikova

Endocrinology Research Centre


Russian Federation

MD, PhD, leading research associate


Competing Interests:

No interests conflict



References

1. Roohafza H, Sadeghi M, Naghnaeian M, et al. Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components with Psychological Distress. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:1-5. doi: 10.1155/2014/203463

2. Slopen N, Goodman E, Koenen KC, Kubzansky LD. Socioeconomic and other social stressors and biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in youth: a systematic review of less studied risk factors. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064418

3. Yan YX, Xiao HB, Wang SS, et al. Investigation of the Relationship Between Chronic Stress and Insulin Resistance in a Chinese Population. J Epidemiol. 2016;26(7):355-360. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150183

4. Amihaesei IC, Chelaru L. Metabolic syndrome a widespread threatening condition; risk factors, diagnostic criteria, therapeutic options, prevention and controversies: an overview. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2014;118(4):896-900.

5. Liu H, Song H, Tian R, et al. Association between occupational psychological stress and metabolic syndrome. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2015;33(2):88-92.

6. Fang CY, Boden G, Siu PT, Tseng M. Stressful life events are associated with insulin resistance among Chinese immigrant women in the United States. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.06.013

7. Saylor J, Friedmann E. Biopsychosocial Contributors to Metabolic Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis of 2007-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Nurs Res. 2015;64(6):434-443. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000121

8. Boylan JM, Ryff CD. Psychological well-being and metabolic syndrome: findings from the midlife in the United States national sample. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(5):548-558. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000192

9. Buitrago-Lopez A, van den Hooven EH, Rueda-Clausen CF, et al. Socioeconomic status is positively associated with measures of adiposity and insulin resistance, but inversely associated with dyslipidaemia in Colombian children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(6):580-587. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204992

10. Perel P, Langenberg C, Ferrie J, et al. Household wealth and the metabolic syndrome in the Whitehall II study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(12):2694-2700. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0022

11. Бодров В.А. Психологический стресс: развитие и преодоление. – М.: ПЕР СЭ; 2006. [Bodrov VA. Psikhologicheskiy stress: razvitie i preodolenie. Moscow: PER SE; 2006. (in Russ.)]

12. Брайт Д., Джонс Ф. Стресс. Теории, исследования, мифы. – СПб.: Прайм-ЕВРОЗНАК, 2003. [Brayt D, Dzhons F. Stress. Teorii, issledovaniya, mify. Saint-Petersberg: Praym-EVROZNAK; 2003. (in Russ.)]

13. Китаев-Смык Л.А. Организм и стресс. Стресс жизни и стресс смерти. – М.: Смысл; 2012. [Kitaev-Smyk LA. Organizmi stress. Stress zhiznii stress smerti. Moscow: Smysl; 2012. (in Russ.)]

14. Моросанова В.И., Аронова Е.А. Самосознание и саморегуляция поведения. – М.: Издательство «Институт психологии РАН»; 2007. [Morosanova VI, Aronova EA. Samosoznanie I samoregulyatsiy apovedeniya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN; 2007. (in Russ.)]

15. Cахарный диабет типа 2: от теории к практике. / Под ред. Дедова И.И., Шестаковой М.В. – М.: ООО «Издательство «Медицинское информационное агентство»; 2016. [Diabetes mellitus type 2: from a theory to practice. Ed by Dedov II, Shestakova MV. Moscow: MIA; 2016. (in Russ.)]

16. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412-419. doi: 10.1007/bf00280883

17. Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and Abuse of HOMA Modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(6):1487-1495. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1487

18. Столин В.В., Пантилеев С.Р. Опросник самоотношения. В кн.: Практикум по психодиагностике: Психодиагностические материалы. Под. ред. А.А. Бодалева. – М: Издательство Московского университета, 1988. — С. 123-130. [Stolin VV, Pantileev SR. Oprosnik samootnosheniya. In: Bodalev AA, editor. Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike: Psikhodiagnosticheskie materialy. Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House; 1988. P.123-130. (in Russ.)]

19. Реан А.А. Практическая психодиагностика личности: учебное пособие. — СПб; Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета; 2001. [Rean AA. Prakticheskaya psikhodiagnostika lichnosti. Saint-Petersberg: Saint-Petersberg University Publishing House, 2001. (in Russ.)]

20. Водопьянова Н.Е. Психодиагностика стресса. – СПб.: Питер, 2009. [Vodopyanova NE. Psikhodiagnostika stressa. Saint-Petersberg: Piter; 2009. (in Russ.)]

21. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Coping and emotion. In: Lazarus MA, Lazarus RS. Stress and Coping. N-Y; 1991: 207-227.


Supplementary files

1. Рис. 1. Ассоциации самоотношения (ОСО) с уровнями ИР и HbA1c.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (29KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
2. Рис. 2. Выраженность ассертивного поведения у респондентов с разным уровнем HOMA-ИР, баллы.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (10KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
3. Рис. 3. Частота ответов на вопрос «Как часто Вы специально выделяете время для физических нагрузок?» (анкета «Особенности образа жизни»), %.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (9KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
4. Рис. 4. Распределение частоты ответов респондентов на вопрос «Какие жиры Вы чаще употребляете?» (анкета «Особенности образа жизни»), %.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (8KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
5. Рис. 5. Значения HOMA-ИР у респондентов, предпочитающих определенные продукты (анкета «Особенности образа жизни»).
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (17KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
6. Рис. 6. Значения HOMA-ИР у респондентов с разным семейным положением.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (10KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Motovilin O.G., Surkova E.V., Mayorov A.Y., Koksharova E.O., Melnikova O.G. Insulin resistance and its possible personal stress moderators. Diabetes mellitus. 2017;20(3):172-180. https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-5844

Views: 2484


ISSN 2072-0351 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0378 (Online)