Preview

Diabetes mellitus

Advanced search

Efficacy of routine diabetic foot treatments at an outpatient clinic: a cohort study

https://doi.org/10.14341/DM20143107-112

Abstract

Reliable data on the efficacy of treatment for diabetic foot (DF) ulcers (DFUs) is essential for planning outpatient services, comparison of several DF clinics, pharmacoeconomic studies and prognosis of healing time. However, no reports based on Russian DF cases have been published to date.
Aim.
The aim of our study was to analyse of the outcomes of routine DFU treatments at one DF outpatient clinic (DFOC).
Materials and methods.
We analysed the medical records of all patients admitted to one DFOC for foot/leg ulcers in 2012 (72 patients, 77 episodes of treatment, 124 ulcers in total). The median age of the patients was 66 years (range: 45?90 years), 51% patients were females and 49% were males. Three (4%) patients had type 1 diabetes mellitus, whereas the rest had type 2 diabetes mellitus. The median duration of ulcer prior to the initiation of treatment was 31 days (range: 1?392 days). A total of 106 (85%) cases involved DFUs, whereas 18 (15%) involved leg ulcers in patients with diabetes. One patient had a combination of foot and leg ulcers. Examination and treatment of all patients were conducted by a single experienced doctor according to international and national guidelines. The follow-up time ranged from 8?20 months.
Results.
Lower extremity ischemia was observed in 39% cases. The healing rate for all ulcers at 3, 6 and 12 months was 34%, 51% and 65%, respectively. At follow-up time, ulcers remained unhealed in 16% patients and 9% survived amputations [1 (1%), below knee; 6 (8%), minor)]. Furthermore, 4% patients died on account of cardiovascular events. The results of the present study were comparable to those reported in other countries. Modern and effective treatment modalities (such as contact casting and revascularisation) were not used extensively; therefore, their active utilisation is necessary to improve treatment outcomes.
Conclusions.



  1. The healing rate for ulcers in our cohort was 34%, 51% and 65% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively.

  2. Treatment efficacy should be improved by increasing the use of total contact casting and revascularisation.

  3. Person-related measures (i.e. healing of all ulcers in a patient) are optimal for most cases, although ulcer-related measures can be significant in cases where several ulcers are detected in a patient.

  4. Our studied cohort is typical for a DFOC; therefore, our data can be used for planning outpatient services, evaluation of other DFOCs and pharmacoeconomic studies.

About the Authors

Oleg Viktorovich Udovichenko
Municipial polyclinic #22, Moscow
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, endocrinologist in Diabetic Foot Clinic


Competing Interests:

Конфликта интересов нет



Eugenia Alexandrovna Berseneva
Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, Moscow
Russian Federation

MD, PhD. Professor, Head of Public Health and Health Economics Department


Competing Interests:

Конфликта интересов нет



References

1. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. Amsterdam; 1999. Available from: http://iwgdf.org/

2. Максимова Н.В. Клинико-экономический анализ консервативной тактики лечения пациентов с синдромом диабетической стопы в городе Москве. Автореф. дисс…канд. мед. наук. М; 2011. [Maksimova N.V. Kliniko-ekonomicheskiy analiz konservativnoy taktiki lecheniya patsientov s sindromom diabeticheskoy stopy v gorode Moskve. [dissertation] Moscow; 2011.]

3. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Harkless LB. Classification of diabetic foot wounds. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35(6):528-531. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(96)80125-6

4. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. Под редакцией И.И. Дедова, М.В. Шестаковой (6-й выпуск). Сахарный диабет. 2013;(1s):1-120. [Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Aleksandrov AA, Galstyan GR, Grigoryan OR, Esayan R, et al. Standards of specialized diabetes care. Edited by Dedov II, Shestakova MV (6th edition). Diabetes mellitus. 2013;(1S):1-120.] doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14341/DM20131S1-121

5. Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Bjansholt T, Cooper R, Moore Z, Peters EJ, et al. EWMA document: Antimicrobials and non-healing wounds. Evidence, controversies and suggestions. J Wound Care. 2013;22(5 Suppl):S1-89. PMid:24645204

6. Abbruzzese L, Teobaldi I, Leporati E, Rizzo L, Iacopi E, Piaggesi A. Effectiveness and safety of a novel gel dressing in the management of neuropathic leg ulcers in diabetic patients: a prospective double-blind randomized trial. Abstractbook of the 6th International Symposium on the Diabetic Foot (2011 May 11-14; Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands), OL47.

7. Jeffcoate WJ, Chipchase SY, Ince P, Game FL. Assessing the outcome of the management of diabetic foot ulcers using ulcer-related and person-related measures. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1784-1787. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0306

8. Margolis DJ, Kantor J, Berlin JA. Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers receiving standard treatment. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(5):692-695. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.692


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Udovichenko O.V., Berseneva E.A. Efficacy of routine diabetic foot treatments at an outpatient clinic: a cohort study. Diabetes mellitus. 2014;17(3):107-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM20143107-112

Views: 867


ISSN 2072-0351 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0378 (Online)