Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a New Method for Pressure Off-load for Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome: Ankle-foot Pneumoorthosis with TM Orlett

Aim.
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy, safety and consumer properties of ankle-foot pneumoorthosis with a HAS-337 TM Orlett compared with non-removable total contact cast (TCC) immobilization.
Materials and methods.
Our study included 40 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) with neuropathic diabetic foot syndrome and chronic uninfected wounds of the plantar surface of the forefoot, with wound duration of at least 3 weeks, wound areas not less than 1 cm2 and wound depths not more than stage II based on Wagner?s classification. We excluded patients with infected wounds, osteomyelitis, Charcot osteoarthropathy or peripheral vascular disease. Our test group included 20 patients who received pressure off-load using ankle-foot pneumoorthosis with a HAS-337 TM Orlett. For a control group (n = 20), pressure off-load was achieved using TCC immobilization. Both groups were comparable with regard to age, gender, duration and degree of diabetes compensation and by original wound defect sizes (p >0.05). The study duration was 6 months. Plantar pressure was measured inside the orthosis or TCC and was compared with test shoe measurements. Our major criteria for pressure relief were reduced pressures in the wound area and the whole foot and the rate of wound healing.
Results.
At the end of the 6-month period, complete healing of all ulcers was achieved. The average healing time was 46.1?19.0 days for the test group and was 48.3?20.5 days for the control group (p >0.05). Two patients who wore pneumoorthosis with HAS-337 were discontinued upon patient request.
With pneumoorthosis, the maximum peak pressure on the foot and wound defect areas was reduced by 26% and 57%, respectively. The pressure/time integral decreased on average by 41% (p >0.05). Furthermore, in the midfoot area with pneumoorthosis, the maximum pressure increased by 48% and the pressure/time integral increased by 47%.
Conclusions.
Using pneumoorthosis with HAS-337 was an effective and safe method for pressure off-load, resulting in 100% healing of uninfected neuropathic ulcers of the plantar surface of the forefoot. However, pneumoorthosis with HAS-337 is not recommended for those patients with wound defects in the midfoot and heel areas.

diabetes mellitus, diabetic foot, pedography, pressure relief, ankle-foot orthosis

1. Cavanagh P, Ulbrecht J, Caputo G The biomechanics of the foot in diabetes mellitus. The diabetic foot (6th edition). Bowker J, Pfeifer M, editors. Mosby; 2001:125-195.

2. International working group on the diabetic foot. The consensus report: Footwear and off-loading for the diabetic foot - an evidence based guideline. DVD edition, Amsterdam, 2007.

3. Ha Van, G, , Siney H, Hartmann-Heurtier A, Jacqueminet S, Greau F, Grimaldi A. Nonremovable, Windowed, Fiberglass Cast Boot in the Treatment of Diabetic Plantar Ulcers: Efficacy, safety, and compliance. Diabetes Care 2003;26(10):2848-2852. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.2337/diacare.26.10.2848 doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2848.

4. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. Activity Patterns of Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulceration: Patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a standard pressure off-loading regimen. Diabetes Care 2003;26(9):2595-2597. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.2337/diacare.26.9.2595 doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2595.

5. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Wu S, Boulton AJ. Evaluation of Removable and Irremovable Cast Walkers in the Healing of Diabetic Foot Wounds: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2005;28(3):551-554. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.2337/diacare.28.3.551 PubMed PMID: 15735186. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.551.

6. Piaggesi A, Macchiarini S, Rizzo L, Palumbo F, Tedeschi A, Nobili LA, et al. An Off-the-Shelf Instant Contact Casting Device for the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A randomized prospective trial versus traditional fiberglass cast. Diabetes Care 2007;30(3):586-590. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.2337/dc06-1750 PubMed PMID: 17327325. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1750.

7. Галстян ГР, Страхова ГЮ, Удовиченко ОВ, Логвинов НЛ, Дедов ИИ. Применение иммобилизирующих разгрузочных повязок при лечении синдрома диабетической стопы (методика Total Contact Cast). Методические рекомендации. Издание 3-е, переработанное и дополненное. Москва. 2010 [Galstyan GH, Strakhova GYu, Udovychenko OV, Logvinov NL, Dedov II. Application of immobilization offloading bandages in the treatment diabetic foot syndrome (Procedure Total Contact Cast). Guidelines. 3rd edition, revised and enlarged. Moscow; 2010]

8. Cavanagh P., Ulbrecht J., Caputo G. The biomechanics of the foot in diabetes mellitus. / In: The diabetic foot (6th edition). Bowker J, Pfeifer M, editors. Mosby. 2001:125-195.

9. Горохов СВ, Удовиченко ОВ, Ульянова ИН, Берсенева ЕА, Галстян ГР Педографическая и клиническая оценка эффективности иммобилизирующих разгрузочных повязок при синдроме диабетической стопы Сахарный диабет.2012;3: 50-58.[Gorokhov SV, Udovychenko OV, Ulyanova IN, Berseneva EA, Galstyan GR. Pedography and clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the immobilization offloading bandages in diabetic foot. Diabetes mellitus 2012;-(3):50-58.] doi: 10.14341/2072-0351-6086