Genitourinary safety aspects of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes
https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13523
Abstract
The introduction of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) into treatment algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has initiated a shift from the traditional glucose-centric model to a strategy that considers multiple pathogenetic factors and clinical outcomes. Despite their proven efficacy in reducing cardiovascular mortality and chronic kidney disease progression, the actual clinical use of SGLT2i is often accompanied by patient complaints of dysuria, raising additional questions for clinicians regarding the urogenital safety of SGLT2i. This review summarizes current pathophysiological data, clinical trial results, and meta-analyses regarding the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and genital mycotic infections (GMIs) associated with the use of various SGLT2i. The pathogenesis of these complications is diverse, with the primary component being pharmacological glucosuria, which transforms the urinary tract microenvironment into a breeding ground for pathogens, enhancing the expression of Escherichia coli virulence factors and stimulating the growth of Candida. The risk of infection is further exacerbated by the fact that patients with T2DM often exhibit signs of secondary immunodeficiency and neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
Currently, it is clear that the development of GMIs is a consistent adverse event associated with the use of SGLT2i, with a frequency more than three times higher than with placebo. However, significant heterogeneity is observed with respect to UTIs: a statistically significant risk has been confirmed primarily for dapagliflozin at a dose of 10 mg, while data for other members of the class are less clear. However, luseogliflozin and ipragliflozin demonstrate the most favorable safety profiles for urogenital infections. In 2015, the FDA expressed significant concern about the development of severe infections such as urosepsis and pyelonephritis. However, subsequent studies showed no association between SGLT2i use and the risk of these conditions. Furthermore, some studies found that inappropriate drug discontinuation after a UTI episode could lead to increased mortality and worse renal outcomes.
About the Authors
L. A. SuplotovaRussian Federation
Lyudmila A. Suplotova, MD, PhD, Professor
54 Odesskaya street, 625023 Tyumen
Competing Interests:
Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с содержанием настоящей статьи. Статья подготовлена при информационной поддержке компании АО Сервье (Россия).
A. S. Kokin
Russian Federation
Artem S. Kokin, MD
Kurgan
Competing Interests:
Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с содержанием настоящей статьи. Статья подготовлена при информационной поддержке компании АО Сервье (Россия).
A. A. Golubeva
Russian Federation
Alena A. Golubeva, MD
Tyumen
Competing Interests:
Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с содержанием настоящей статьи. Статья подготовлена при информационной поддержке компании АО Сервье (Россия).
References
1. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Vikulova OK, et al. Diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation: dynamics of epidemiological indicators according to the Federal Register of Diabetes Mellitus for the period 2010-2022. Diabetes Mellitus. 2023;26(2):104-123. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13035
2. Tinajero MG, Malik VS. An update on the epidemiology of type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2021;50(3):337-355. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2021.05.013.
3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 11th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2025.
4. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Galstyan GR. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the adult population of Russia (NATION study). Diabetes Mellitus. 2016;19(2):104-112. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM2004116-17.
5. Nedogoda SV, Salasyuk AS, Barykina IN, et al. Budget impact analysis of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who failed to achieve glycemic targets on metformin. Endocrinology: News, Opinions, Training. 2021;10(4):33-43. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.33029/2304-9529-2021-10-4-33-43
6. Trubitsyna NP, Zaitseva NV, Severina AS, et al. Chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: new targets of medicine action. Diabetes Mellitus. 2022;25(5):492-498. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12944
7. Rangaswami J., Bhalla V., de Boer I.H., et al. Cardiorenal protection with the newer antidiabetic agents in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020; 142 (17): e265-e286.
8. Tsygankova OV, Timoshchenko OV, Tuzovskaya OV, et al. Potential new application points of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure in combination with diabetes mellitus, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and anemia (literature review). Siberian Scientific Medical Journal. 2022;42(6):4-14. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18699/SSMJ20220601
9. Salukhov VV, Khalimov YS, Shustov SB, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors and kidneys: mechanisms and main effects in diabetes mellitus patients. Diabetes Mellitus. 2020;23(5):475-491. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12123
10. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117-2128. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.
11. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644-657. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1611925
12. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347-357. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1812389
13. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295-2306. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1811744
14. Sturov NV, Popov SV, Mamporia NK, et al. Urinary tract infections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with pharmacological glucosuria. Therapeutic Archive. 2020;92(11):106-109. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.26442/00403660.2020.11.000581
15. Kittipibul V, Cox ZL, Chesdachai S, et al. Genitourinary Tract Infections in Patients Taking SGLT2 Inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(16):1568-1578. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.01.040
16. Selikhanova VM, Isayeva KhT, Arshidinova KM, et al. Diabetic nephropathy: analysis of risk factors affecting the development of chronic kidney disease in diabetes mellitus. Meditsina i ekologiya. 2021;99(2):75-79. (In Russ.)
17. Nasyrtdinova AD. Optimization of the treatment of urinary tract infection in patients with diabetes mellitus [dissertation]. Ufa: Bashkir State Medical University; 2024. (In Russ.)
18. Desai R, Batura D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and treatment choices in emphysematous pyelonephritis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(4):717-736. doi:10.1007/s11255-022-03131-6
19. Burekovic A, Haskovic E, Ceric F, et al. Correlation Between Inflammatory and Biochemical Parameters in Patients with Diabetes and Urinary Tract Infection. Mater Sociomed. 2021;33(4):240-243. doi:10.5455/msm.2021.33.240-243
20. Islam MJ, Bagale K, John PP, et al. Glycosuria alters uropathogenic Escherichia coli global gene expression and virulence. mSphere. 2022;7:e0000422. doi:10.1128/msphere.00004-22.
21. Kogan MI, Naboka YL. Sources of bacterial penetration into the kidney (review ‒ part II). Urologiia. 2021;(3):140-144. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2021.3.140-144
22. Paudel S, John PP, Poorbaghi SL, et al. Systematic Review of Literature Examining Bacterial Urinary Tract Infections in Diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2022;2022:3588297. doi:10.1155/2022/3588297
23. Sharifullina ER, Zharova AA, Styazhkina SN. Review of foreign literature on purulent-inflammatory kidney diseases. Modern Science. 2022;4-1:279-282. (In Russ.)
24. Ray A, Bonorden MJL, Pandit R, et al. Infections and immunity: associations with obesity and related metabolic disorders. J Pathol Transl Med. 2023;57(1):28-42. doi:10.4132/jptm.2022.11.14
25. Verma A, Kaur M, Luthra P, et al. Immunological aspects of host-pathogen crosstalk in the co-pathogenesis of diabetes and latent tuberculosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;12:957512. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.957512
26. Morugova TV, Nasyrtdinova AD, Chakryan SA. Optimising treatment of urinary tract infections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Doctor.Ru. 2020;19(2):20-26. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-2-20-26
27. Liu Y, Huang H, Gao R, et al. Dynamic phenotypes and molecular mechanisms to understand the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy in two widely used animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:172. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00172
28. Alibaeva GF, Morugova TV, Nasyrtdinova AD. The effect of licopid on the level of interleukin-4 and the functional activity of neutrophils in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with urinary tract infection. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2021;(1):49. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30452
29. Loran OB, Pushkar DY, Al-Shukri SK, et al. Expert Council «Urinary tract immunity in the context of chronic infections.» How to increase the effectiveness of treatment? RMJ. Medical Review. 2021;5(3):134-136. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-3-137-144
30. Sukhareva OYu, Zuraeva ZT, Shamkhalova MSh. Gliflozins position update in the treatment algorithms for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: new pathogenetic mechanisms and data from subanalyses of the large randomised control trails. Diabetes Mellitus. 2021;24(6):553-564. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12864
31. Salukhov VV, Galstyan GR, Ilyinskaya TA. Practical aspects of initiation and use of SGLT2 inhibitors: inpatient and outpatient perspectives. Diabetes Mellitus. 2022;25(3):275-287. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12855
32. Aboukaoud M, Morhi Y, Osher E. Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors and Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Real-World Meta-Analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2025;59(10):891-903. doi:10.1177/10600280241312432
33. Cai T, Ke Q, Fang Y, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition suppresses HIF-1α-mediated metabolic switch from lipid oxidation to glycolysis in kidney tubule cells of diabetic mice. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(5):390. doi:10.1038/s41419-020-2544-7
34. Khrabrova MS, Panaetova SK. Effects of dapagliflozin in IgA-nephropathy in real clinical practice. New St. Petersburg Medical Records. 2025;104(3):59-67. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.24884/1609-2201-2025-104-3-59-67
35. Doi Y, Hamano T, Fukuda-Doi M, et al. Urinary Dipstick Findings and UTI Risk With SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CANVAS and CREDENCE Trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2026. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfag062
36. Chen L, Xue Q, Yan C, et al. Comparative safety of different recommended doses of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1256548. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1256548
37. Li CX, Liu LY, Zhang CX, et al. Comparative safety of different sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1238399. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1238399
38. Khokhlov AL, Gorelov KV, Rybachkova JV. Aspects of the safety of hypoglycemic drugs according to the results of clinical trials. Patient-oriented Medicine and Pharmacy. 2023;1(2):63-74. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.37489/2949-1924-0016
39. Shestakova MV, Galstyan GR, Kvasnikov BB, et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control on insulin: a network meta-analysis. Diabetes Mellitus. 2024;27(6):543-554. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13244
40. McGovern AP, Hogg M, Shields BM, et al. Risk factors for genital infections in people initiating SGLT2 inhibitors and their impact on discontinuation. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1):e001238. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001238
41. Wu MZ, Guo R, Chandramouli C, et al. Urinary tract infection and continuation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in diabetic patients. Eur Heart J. 2025;46(12):1582-1593. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf788
42. Katsuhara Y, Ogawa T. Acute Renal Failure, Ketoacidosis, and Urogenital Tract Infections with SGLT2 Inhibitors: Signal Detection Using a Japanese Spontaneous Reporting Database. Clin Drug Investig. 2020;40(7): 645-652. doi:10.1007/s40261-020-00925-3
43. Tiwary M, Milder TY, Stocker SL, et al. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor therapy: use in chronic kidney disease and adjunctive sodium restriction. Intern Med J. 2022;52(10):1666-1676. doi:10.1111/imj.15727
44. Kadokura T, Zhang W, Krauwinkel W, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53(11):975-988. doi:10.1007/s40262-014-0180-z
45. Sasaki T, Seino Y, Fukatsu A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Luseogliflozin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Single-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Adv Ther. 2015;32(4):319-40. doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0200-x.
Supplementary files
|
|
1. Рисунок 1. Частота встречаемости возбудителей инфекции мочевыводящих путей у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2 типа. | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(216KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
2. Рисунок 2. Предпосылки к развитию дизурического синдрома у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2 типа. | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(150KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Suplotova L.A., Kokin A.S., Golubeva A.A. Genitourinary safety aspects of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes mellitus. 2026;29(4):401-409. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13523
JATS XML
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).








































