Preview

Diabetes mellitus

Advanced search

The place of fixed combination of sulfonylurea derivatives and metformin in the modern treatment paradigm for type 2 diabetes mellitus

https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13474

Abstract

The evolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment has contributed to the emergence of a disease-modifying, cardio-renal-hepatocentric approach in the global medical community. This has shifted the focus of therapy from simple glycemic control to comprehensive organ protection, driven by a growing understanding of the relationship between hyperglycemia and the development of cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic complications. Current clinical guidelines emphasize the importance of combining hypoglycemic agents with additional organ-protective properties, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 agonists). At the same time, it is noted that for patients with low and moderate risk of complications and limited resources, traditional medications, primarily metformin and sulfonylurea derivatives (SU), remain relevant. This review analyzes current recommendations for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and provides a detailed discussion of the advantages and limitations of sulfonylureas (SUs), as well as the fixed-dose combination of glibenclamide and metformin (Glucovance). This combination offers a synergistic effect, high glucose-lowering activity, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use, which is especially important for patients with marked hyperglycemia and low adherence to therapy. The article discusses the indications for prescribing the fixed-dose combination based on the T2DM phenotype, compares the pros and cons of “old” and “new” medications, and evaluates the potential for combining sulfonylureas and metformin with modern organoprotective agents.

Glucovance remains a popular and effective tool in the endocrinologist’s arsenal, especially when balancing treatment efficacy, safety, and cost.

About the Authors

A. Y. Babenko
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation

Alina Yu. Babenko, MD, PhD, Professor

Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

none



V. I. Alferova
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation

Vlada I. Alferova, MD, PhD

 2 Akkuratova street, 197341 Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

none



References

1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes. 2022;41(1):4–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-as01

2. Marx N, Federici M, Schütt K, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(39):4043–4140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192

3. Ovsiannikov KV. Cardiocentric and glucose-centric principles of therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus as the unity and struggle of opposites // Atmosphere. Cardiology News. — 2020;(3):37–44. (In Russ.)

4. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2560-2572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802987

5. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720

6. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–657. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611925

7. Lee CH, Lui DT, Lam KS. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: An update. J Diabetes Investig. 2022;13(6):930–940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13756

8. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2441

9. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–1589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806470

10. Ceriello A, Colagiuri S. IDF global clinical practice recommendations for managing type 2 diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025;222 Suppl 1:112152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112152

11. Khunti K, Zaccardi F, Amod A, et al. Glycaemic control is still central in the hierarchy of priorities in type 2 diabetes management. Diabetologia. 2025;68(1):17–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06254-w

12. Zaccardi F, Kloecker DE, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Non-inferiority and clinical superiority of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: Systematic analysis of cardiorenal outcome trials in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(8):1598–1606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14735

13. Kunutsor SK, Zaccardi F, Balasubramanian VG, et al. Glycaemic control and macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials of novel glucose-lowering agents. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(5):1837–1849. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15500

14. Sim R, Chong CW, Loganadan NK, et al. Comparative effectiveness of cardiovascular, renal and safety outcomes of second-line antidiabetic drugs use in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabet Med. 2022;39(3):e14780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14780

15. Palmer SC, Tendal B, Mustafa RA, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021;372:m4573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4573

16. Giugliano D, Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, et al. Glycemic Control, Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease, and Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcome Trials and Intensive Glucose Control Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(12):e012356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012356

17. McGuire DK, Shih WJ, Cosentino F, et al. Association of SGLT2 Inhibitors With Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(2):148–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4511

18. Neves JS, Borges-Canha M, Vasques-Nóvoa F, et al. GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy With and Without SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(6):517–525. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.048

19. DeFronzo RA. Combination therapy with GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(10):1353–1362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12982

20. Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221–2232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2307563

21. IDF Global Clinical Practice Recommendations for Managing Type 2 Diabetes 2025. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025;224:112238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112238

22. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, et al. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2753–2786. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dci22-0034

23. Alexander JT, Staab EM, Wan W, et al. The Longer-Term Benefits and Harms of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(2):415–438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07105-9

24. Wu JH, Foote C, Blomster J, et al. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and major safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(5):411–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00052-8

25. Soleimani H, Saeedian B, Pasebani Y, et al. Safety of sodiumglucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors drugs among heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ESC Heart Fail. 2024;11(2):637–648. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14633

26. Davies MJ, Chubb BD, Smith IC, Valentine WJ. Cost-utility analysis of liraglutide compared with sulphonylurea or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin monotherapy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012;29(3):313–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03429.x

27. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of onceweekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulinnaive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):355–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30085-2

28. Quinapanta Castro NI, Almeida M, Orbea AF, et al. Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Nondiabetic Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e82479. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82479

29. Dedov I, Shestakova M, Sukhareva O, et al. Standards of Specialized Diabetes Care / Edited by Dedov I.I., Shestakova M.V., Sukhareva O.Yu. 12th Edition. Diabetes mellitus. 2025;28(5S):1–175. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM20255S

30. Hirst JA, Farmer AJ, Dyar A, et al. Estimating the effect of sulfonylurea on HbA1c in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2013;56(5):973–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2856-6

31. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(1 Suppl 1):S181–S206. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S009

32. Kocarnik BM, Moore KP, Smith NL, Boyko EJ. Weight change after initiation of oral hypoglycemic monotherapy for diabetes predicts 5-year mortality: An observational study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;123:181–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2016.11.025

33. Rasouli N, Younes N, Ghosh A, et al; GRADE Research Group. Longitudinal Effects of Glucose-Lowering Medications on β-Cell Responses and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes: The GRADE Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(4):580–588. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-1070

34. Cordiner RLM, Bedair K, Mari A, Pearson E. Low-Dose Sulfonylurea Plus DPP4 Inhibitor Lower Blood Glucose and Enhance BetaCell Function Without Hypoglycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109(8):2106–2115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae033

35. Chen MH, Lin LY, Hung TY, et al. Comparative cardiovascular risk of sulfonylureas with low- and high-affinities for cardiac mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;27(12):7502–7513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70157

36. Mkrtumyan AM, Biryukova EV, Markina NV. Glukovans - a highly effective combination of metformin and glibenclamide in one pill. RMJ. 2008;16(17):1017–1022. (In Russ.)]

37. Tosi F, Muggeo M, Brun E, et al. Combination treatment with metformin and glibenclamide versus single-drug therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, doubleblind, comparative study. Metabolism. 2003;52(7):862–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00101-x

38. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al; Professional Practice Committee, American Diabetes Association; European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49(8):1711–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0316-2

39. Xiao K, Tang J, Yang X, et al. Impact of glibenclamide pretreatment on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective case-control study. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):30666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15764-5

40. dos Santos NS, Loureiro NN, Correia LS, et al. Effects of glibenclamide/ glyburide on stroke: Systematic review. Brain Hemorrhages. 2024;5(6):274–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hest.2024.07.006

41. Bruce S, Park JS, Fiedorek FT, Howlett HC. Beta-cell response to metformin-glibenclamide combination tablets (Glucovance) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(7):783–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.00994.x

42. Marre M, Howlett H, Lehert P, Allavoine T. Improved glycaemic control with metformin-glibenclamide combined tablet therapy (Glucovance) in Type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on metformin. Diabet Med. 2002;19(8):673–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00774.x

43. Dailey GE. Glyburide/metformin tablets: a new therapeutic option for the management of Type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003;4(8):1417–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.4.8.1417

44. Ahlqvist E, Storm P, Käräjämäki A, et al. Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(5):361-369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30051-2

45. Bonnefond A, Semple RK. Achievements, prospects and challenges in precision care for monogenic insulin-deficient and insulin-resistant diabetes. Diabetologia. 2022;65(11):1782–1795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05720-7

46. Goldenberg RM, Berard LD, Cheng AYY, et al. SGLT2 Inhibitor-associated Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Clinical Review and Recommendations for Prevention and Diagnosis. Clin Ther. 2016;38(12):2654–2664.e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.002

47. Lanning MS, Carmody D, Szczerbiński Ł, et al. Hypoglycemia in sulfonylurea-treated KCNJ11-neonatal diabetes: Mild-moderate symptomatic episodes occur infrequently but none involving unconsciousness or seizures. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(3):393–397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12599

48. Fulcher G, Matthews DR, Perkovic V, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin used in conjunction with sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Ther. 2015;6(3):289–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-015-0117-z

49. Ji L, Han P, Liu Y, et al. Canagliflozin in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin alone or metformin in combination with sulphonylurea. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(1):23–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12385


Review

For citations:


Babenko A.Y., Alferova V.I. The place of fixed combination of sulfonylurea derivatives and metformin in the modern treatment paradigm for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus. 2026;29(3):283-289. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13474

Views: 63

JATS XML

ISSN 2072-0351 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0378 (Online)