Preview

Diabetes mellitus

Advanced search

Real-world effectiveness and safety of fixed-ratio combination insulin glargine 100 u/ml plus lixisenatide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM): subanalysis of the international, multicentre, prospective observational study SUCCESS in the Russian population

https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13236

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the impact a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine(100U/ml) and lixisenatide(iGlarLixi) on the glycemic control in Russian study T2D population uncontrolled on OAD ± insulin therapy in real-world settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Russian subanalysis of international, multicentre, prospective, observational SUCCESS study included 160 T2DM patients who had initiated iGlarLixi within 1 month prior to study inclusion from 11 regions of the Russian Federation. The primary endpoint — HbA1c change from baseline to month 6. Secondary endpoints: HbA1c change after 12 months, achievement of target HbA1c levels after 6 and 12 months; change in FPG and PPG, change in body weight after 6 and 12 months, iGlarLixi dose dynamics. Safety endpoints: adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, frequency of hypoglycemia during the study period.

RESULTS: The average age of patients in the Russian population was 60.8±9.4 years; average duration of T2DM was 11.4 years, mean HbA1c — 9.3±1.5%; mean BMI 33.3 kg/m2. Prior to the study, most patients were on 2 (36.3%) and 3 OADs (27.5%), 32.5% — on insulin therapy. The mean change of HbA1c at month 6 was -1.81%, and -2.03% at month 12. 51.3% patients achieved individual HbA1c targets at month 12, 46.7% of patients achieved the HbA1c target without hypoglycemia and weight gain. The decrease of body weight in 12 months was -3.3±4.4 kg. During the study period, 17 cases of hypoglycemia were recorded (0.11 events per patient-year); 1 severe hypoglycemia (0.01 events per patient-year). The total number of adverse events (AEs) was 43(26.9%), serious AEs - 10 (6.3%).

CONCLUSION: According to the results of this prospective real world sub-group analysis, initiation of iGlarLixi in Russian adults with T2DM uncontrolled on OADs ± insulin significantly improves glycemic control with low risk of hypoglycemia and no body weight increase.

About the Authors

O. K. Vikulova
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Olga K. Vikulova - MD, PhD, associate professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



R. A. Atanesyan
Regional Endocrinological center
Russian Federation

Rosa A. Atanesyan - MD, PhD.

Stavropol


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



S. D. Movsesyan
Outpatient department №25
Russian Federation

Stella D. Movsesyan

Krasnodar


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



Yu. P. Kasatkina
OPD №1 of Central city clinical hospital
Russian Federation

Julia P. Kasatkina - MD.

Ulyanovsk


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



A. A. Perevyazka
Regional Endocrinological center
Russian Federation

Alexandra A. Perevyazka - MD.

Stavropol


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



E. L. Zaytseva
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Ekaterina L. Zaitseva - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



M. I. Kharakhulakh
Endocrinological Diagnostical centre of regional CH
Russian Federation

Marina I. Kharakhulach - MD.

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



N. V. Andreeva
Сlinical diagnostic center №6
Russian Federation

Natalya V. Andreeva - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



I. A. Krivosheyeva
Clinical city hospital №1
Russian Federation

Inga A. Krivosheeva - MD.

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



S. V. Vorobyev
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Vorobyev - MD, PhD, Professor.

Rostov-on-Don


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



T. V. Saprina
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation

Tatiana V. Saprina - MD, PhD, Professor.

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



D. A. Avaliani
Regional Endocrinological center
Russian Federation

Diana A. Avaliani - MD.

Stavropol


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



M. A. Prudnikova
JSC Sanofi Russia
Russian Federation

Marina A. Prudnikova - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author is an employee of JSC Sanofi Russia.



M. V. Shestakova
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Marina V. Shestakova - MD, PhD, Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



N. G. Mokrysheva
Endocrinology Research Centre
Russian Federation

Natalya G. Mokrysheva - MD, PhD, Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.



References

1. Algoritmy spetsializirovannoi meditsinskoi pomoshchi bol’nym sakharnym diabetom (11th edition). Ed by I.I. Dedov, M.V. Shestakova, A.Yu. Maiorov. — Moscow; 2023. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM1304

2. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii «Sakharnyi diabet 2 tipa u vzroslykh». 2022. (In Russ.) Доступ по: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/290_2

3. Rosenstock J, Emral R, Sauque-Reyna L, et al. Advancing Therapy in Suboptimally Controlled Basal Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Outcomes With iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in the SoliMix Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(10):2361-2370. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-0393

4. Aroda VR, Rosenstock J, Wysham C, et al. Efficacy and Safety of LixiLan, a Titratable Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine Plus Lixisenatide in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin and Metformin: The LixiLan-L Randomized Trial [published correction appears in Diabetes Care. 2017;40(6):809. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-er06d. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):1972-1980. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1495

5. Rosenstock J, Aronson R, Grunberger G, et al. Benefits of LixiLan, a Titratable Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine Plus Lixisenatide, Versus Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide Monocomponents in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Oral Agents: The LixiLan-O Randomized Trial [published correction appears in Diabetes Care. 2017;40(6):809. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-er06c]. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2026-2035. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0917

6. Blonde L, Rosenstock J, Del Prato S, et al. Switching to iGlarLixi Versus Continuing Daily or Weekly GLP-1 RA in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled by GLP-1 RA and Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy: The LixiLan-G Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(11):2108-2116. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1357

7. Malik RA, Hwu CM, Jammah AA, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide in adults with type 2 diabetes: An international, multicentre, 12-month, prospective observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(7):2811-2819. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15599

8. Brod M, Hammer M, Christensen T, Lessard S, et al. Understanding and assessing the impact of treatment in diabetes: the Treatment-Related Impact Measures for Diabetes and Devices (TRIM-Diabetes and TRIM-Diabetes Device). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-83

9. Bala C, Cerghizan A, Mihai BM, et al. Real-world evidence on the use of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes in Romania: a prospective cohort study (STAR. Ro). BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e060852. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060852

10. Lajara R, Heller C, Pantalone KM, et al. iGlarLixi versus premixed insulin initiation in adults with type 2 diabetes advancing from basal insulin therapy: The SoliComplex real-world study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(5):1249-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14974

11. Candido R, Modugno M, Larosa M, et al. Effectiveness, Safety, and Appropriateness in the Use of the Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide in Type 2 Diabetes: The ENSURE Retrospective Real-World Study. Diabetes Ther. 2023;14(1):77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01328-7

12. Antsiferov MB, Demidov NA, Balberova MA, Safronova TI, Mishra OA, Magomedova SG. Real World Effectiveness of fixed combination of glargine 100 U/ml and lixisenatide therapy in outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study SOLO. Diabetes mellitus. 2022;25(2):112-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12809


Supplementary files

1. Figure 1. Countries participating in the SUCCESS study on the world map.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (248KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
2. Figure 2. Distribution of patients in the SUCCESS study. Included patients — all patients who signed informed consent; safety assessment population — patients treated with iGlarLixi; eligible patients — patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria, with no serious or critical protocol deviations related to these criteria; evaluable patients — patients with available baseline HbA1c levels and at least one HbA1c value after the baseline.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (152KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
3. Figure 3. Dynamics and achievement of target HbA1c levels during the study period.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (273KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
4. Figure 4. Dynamics of FPG and PPG levels during the study period.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (182KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
5. Figure 5. Body weight dynamics at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (88KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
6. Figure 6. Changes in iGlarLixi dose at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (89KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
7. Figure 7. Dynamics in the TRIM-D scale at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (98KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Vikulova O.K., Atanesyan R.A., Movsesyan S.D., Kasatkina Yu.P., Perevyazka A.A., Zaytseva E.L., Kharakhulakh M.I., Andreeva N.V., Krivosheyeva I.A., Vorobyev S.V., Saprina T.V., Avaliani D.A., Prudnikova M.A., Shestakova M.V., Mokrysheva N.G. Real-world effectiveness and safety of fixed-ratio combination insulin glargine 100 u/ml plus lixisenatide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM): subanalysis of the international, multicentre, prospective observational study SUCCESS in the Russian population. Diabetes mellitus. 2024;27(5):468-479. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13236

Views: 462


ISSN 2072-0351 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0378 (Online)