Prognostic consequence of hyperglycemia points in oral glucose intolerance test for the course and outcomes of pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus
https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13143
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The level of glycemia at different points of the glucose tolerance test measure different phases of insulin secretion, accordingly the groups of pregnant women with GDM diagnosed at different points of the test have differences.
AIM: to evaluate the impact of oral glucose tolerance test results for frequency of insulin treatment, incidence of preeclampsia and pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 200 maternal medical cards and hospital cards of birth in women with GDM for the period 2021–2022. The patients were divided into two groups according the results of OGTT: 1st group — 102 pregnant women with fasting hyperglycemia, 2nd group — 98 pregnant women with hyperglycemia in 1 and 2 hours after glucose intake. Differences in age, body weight, BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, therapy of GDM were studied, and the incidence of preeclampsia and pregnancy outcomes were assessed in both groups.
RESULTS: women of the 1st group had significantly higher weight and initial BMI. Pregnant women of both groups with a BMI over 25 kg/m2 more often required insulin treatment. The incidence of preeclampsia, newborn weight and the incidence of macrosomia were higher in 1st group.
CONCLUSION: Fasting hyperglycemia in OGTT is associated with overweight and obesity, and these women are more likely to require insulin therapy. Women with GDM diagnosed by fasting hyperglycemia are at grate risk of developing preeclampsia and macrosomia.
About the Authors
I. V. BunakRussian Federation
Irina V. Bunak, MD
2 Gospitalnaya square, 111020 Moscow
Competing Interests:
there are no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article
M. I. Sviridova
Russian Federation
Mariya I. Sviridova -MD, PhD.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
there are no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article
N. M. Startseva
Russian Federation
Nadezhda M. Startseva - MD, PhD, Professor.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
there are no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article
Yu. A. Hamoeva
Russian Federation
Yunona A. Hamoeva - MD, PhD.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
there are no obvious or potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this article
References
1. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Mayorov AY, et al. Standards of specialized diabetes care. Edited by Dedov I.I., Shestakova M.V., Mayorov A.Yu. 10th edition. Diabetes mellitus. 2021;24(1S):1-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12802
2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 9th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2019 [cited May, 2020]. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/data/en/indicators/14
3. Epishkina-Mininа AA, Khamoshina MB, Grabovsky VM, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: current state of the problem. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2018;6(3)Supplement:23–9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2303-9698-2018-13903
4. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo akusherov-ginekologov (ROAG). Normal’naya beremennost’ — klinicheskie rekomendatsii. 2020.
5. Nedosugova LV. Role of the endocrine system in maintaining glucose homeostasis in health and disease. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(9):586–591 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-9-586-591
6. Poddubskaya EA, Mamedov MN. Evidence-based principles of early diagnostics of carbohydrate metabolism disturbances in the internal disease practice. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2012;11(5):83-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2012-5-83-89
7. Burumkulova FF, Petrukhin VA. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Therapeutic Archive. 2014;86(10):109-115. (In Russ.)
8. Plows JF, Stanley JL, Baker PN, et al. The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113342
9. Rodrigo N, Randall D, Al-Hial FA, et al. Fasting Glucose Level on the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Is Associated with the Need for Pharmacotherapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Nutrients. 2023;15(5):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051226
10. Mijatovic J, Louie JCY, Buso MEC, et al. Effects of a modestly lower carbohydrate diet in gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(2):284-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa137
11. Rasmussen L, Poulsen CW, Kampmann U, et al. Diet and Healthy Lifestyle in the Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):3050. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103050
12. Schernthaner-Reiter MH, Wolf P, Vila G, Luger A. The Interaction of Insulin and Pituitary Hormone Syndromes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:626427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.626427
13. Kim S-H, Park M-J. Effects of growth hormone on glucose metabolism and insulin resistance in human. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;22(3):145-152. https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2017.22.3.145
14. Carrasco-Wong I, Moller A, Giachini FR, et al. Placental structure in gestational diabetes mellitus. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(2):165535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.165535
15. Rodrigo N, Randall D, Al-Hial FA, et al. Fasting Glucose Level on the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Is Associated with the Need for Pharmacotherapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Nutrients. 2023;15(5):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051226
16. Balke S, Weid P, Fangmann L, et al. Glucose Levels of the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (oGTT) Can Predict Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes (GDM). J Clin Med. 2023;12(11):3709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113709
17. Kotzaeridi G, Blätter J, Eppel D, et al. Characteristics of gestational diabetes subtypes classified by oral glucose tolerance test values. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51(9):e13628. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13628
18. Alqudah A, Eastwood KA, Jerotic D, et al. FKBPL and SIRT-1 Are Downregulated by Diabetes in Pregnancy Impacting on Angiogenesis and Endothelial Function. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:650328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.650328
19. Anikeev AS, Startseva NM, Grabovsky VM, et al. Features of metabolism in women with preeclampsia combined with gestational diabetes mellitus. Doctor.Ru. 2023;22(1):62–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-1-62-67
20. Alston MC, Redman LM, Sones JL. An Overview of Obesity, Cholesterol, and Systemic Inflammation in Preeclampsia. Nutrients. 2022;14(10):2087. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14102087
21. Mistry SK, Das Gupta R, Alam S, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcome in South Asia: A systematic review. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2021;4:e00285 https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.285
22. Yu W, Liu X, Wu N. Association between fasting plasma glucose variability and maternal and infant outcomes in patients with hyperglycemia during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Transl Med. 2023;11(2):92. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-6476
23. Naruse K, Akasaka J, Shigemitsu A, et al. Involvement of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Immunological Modulation of Inflammatory Cascade in Preeclampsia. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:325932. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/325932
24. Sviridova MI, Stryuk RI, Chekanova AV, Kandalina VV. Diabetes mellitus as a cause of adverse perinatal outcomes and complications in newborns. Therapy. 2020;1:44-50. (In Russ.) https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2020.1.44-50
Supplementary files
|
1. Figure 1. Comparison of women in Group 1 and Group 2 by pre-pregnancy body mass index. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(96KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
2. Figure 2. Therapy for gestational diabetes mellitus in women from Group 1 and Group 2. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(207KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
3. Figure 3. Proportion of women with a body mass index >25 kg/m² and newborns weighing above the 90th percentile in Group 1 and Group 2. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(175KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
4. Figure 4. Comparison of fetal weight distribution in Group 1 and Group 2. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(318KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Bunak I.V., Sviridova M.I., Startseva N.M., Hamoeva Yu.A. Prognostic consequence of hyperglycemia points in oral glucose intolerance test for the course and outcomes of pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus. 2024;27(6):565-571. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13143

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).