Preview

Diabetes mellitus

Advanced search

Medication Adherence in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Influencing Factors in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13068

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes Mellitus significantly impacts the quality of human resources and substantially increases healthcare costs. Good adherence to diabetes treatment can control blood sugar levels and minimize hospitalization.

AIM: To determine the medication adherence profile in patients with diabetes mellitus and the influencing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was used in Kalinyamatan Primary Health Center, Central Java, Indonesia, involving 90 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Primary data was collected using pretested questionnaires. This research used a total sampling technique to recruit participants. To determine the factors influencing medication adherence in patients with diabetes mellitus, we conducted a logistics regression analysis.

RESULTS: The study showed that medication adherence indicated low in 22 individuals (24.4%) and high in 68 individuals (75.6%). Four factors were significantly influencing medication adherence in patients with diabetes mellitus: age (p-value 0.007), education (p-value 0.048), occupation (p-value 0.012), and family support (p-value 0.002). However, two factors, namely gender (p-value 0.259) and duration of illness (p-value 0.547), were found to have no significant impact on medication adherence.

CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals should have to motivate patients with Diabetes Mellitus to ensure adherence to their prescribed treatment regimen.

For citations:


Lestari P., Liyanovitasari , Prabowo H. Medication Adherence in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Influencing Factors in Indonesia. Diabetes mellitus. 2025;28(2):237-242. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13068

BACKGROUND

Globally, the non-communicable disease prevalence, such as Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension, is estimated to be 25-30% in low- and middle-income countries [1] and 3.3% in developing countries [2]. Indonesia as low- and middle-income country, ranks seventh globally in diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence, with around 10 million adults affected [3]. Complications from type 2 DM are a leading cause of death in the country [4]. Especially in Central Java, Indonesia, DM accounted for 18.33% of all reported non-communicable disease cases and ranked the second highest percentage [5]. Experts project that non-communicable diseases will cause economic losses amounting to 4.47 trillion US$ from 2012 to 2030, equivalent to 1.5 times Indonesia’s 2012 Gross Domestic Product [6]. Furthermore, low public awareness about DM makes it challenging to manage blood glucose effectively, leading to various complications [7].

DM significantly impacts the quality of human resources and substantially increases healthcare costs [8]. Non-communicable diseases have common characteristics that make affected individuals more vulnerable to emergency conditions, such as a two to three times higher risk of heart attacks and strokes [1]. Therefore, all parties, including the community and the government, should actively participate in countering DM [8]. Research indicates that understanding the complexities of patient decision-making helps healthcare professionals engage better with individuals living with diabetes [7]. Good adherence to diabetes treatment can control blood sugar levels and minimize cardiovascular events [9]. For diabetic patients who are unaware of how to adhere to medication properly, unintentional factors such as irregular access to oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin can arise [10]. Patients with lower treatment adherence often exhibit poor glycemic control compared to those with higher adherence [11–13].

Factors influencing medication adherence include gender, education, employment status, duration of illness, health insurance coverage, knowledge about the disease, accessibility to healthcare services, healthcare provider’s role, motivation for treatment, and family support [14–19]. Age, disease duration, treatment adherence, diet, and physical activity can affect blood glucose levels [20][21]. A combined analysis of six studies on anti-diabetic medication practice determinants showed that age and place of residence are significant determinants of adherence to anti-diabetic medication in Ethiopia [22]. Meanwhile, intentional factors like lack of perceived benefits from medication, fear of side effects, and increasing regimen complexity contribute to reduced medication adherence [23][24]. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the medication adherence profile in patients with type 2 DM and the influencing factors in Kalinyamatan Primary Health Center, Central Java, Indonesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Place and period of the research

Place of the research. The study was conducted at at Kalinyamatan Community Health Center in Jepara in October 2022, involving patients with Diabetes Mellitus who visited the health center.

Populations under study

This research involved 90 respondents in Kalinyamatan Primary Health Center, Central Java, Indonesia. We included individuals diagnosed with type 2 DM, having the disease for more than a year, and visiting the health center, and excluded the patients with DM who did not live with their families.

Method of sampling from the studied population (or several studied populations)

This research used a total sampling technique, meaning that all members of the population who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study, ensuring that the sample fully represents the studied population. The researcher wants to capture the characteristics of every individual within the population, leading to more comprehensive and generalizable findings.

Study design

This study conducted a descriptive correlational design with a cross-sectional approach to determine the medication adherence profile in patients with type 2 DM and the influencing factors in Kalinyamatan Primary Health Center, Central Java, Indonesia. Primary data collection was from Diabetes Mellitus patients who visited Kalinyamatan Community Health Center. Respondents filled out questionnaires to gather information on gender, education, age, occupation, duration of illness, family support, and medication adherence. The Perceived Social Support-Family Questionnaire (PSS-Fa) [25] was used to measure the variable of family support while measuring medication adherence using the Morisky Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) questionnaire [26].

Statistical analysis

The collected data from the respondents underwent a thorough review for completeness of responses, scoring, and coding. Subsequently, the data were analyzed using statistical software, SPSS version 22. Descriptive analysis was utilized to describe the characteristics of the respondents, including gender, education, age, occupation, duration of illness, family support, and treatment adherence. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were employed to determine the factors influencing treatment adherence among diabetes mellitus patients.

Ethics review

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universitas Ngudi Waluyo University on October 25, 2022, with approval number 103/KEP/EC/UNW/2022. Informed consent was provided to all respondents before participating in the study.

RESULTS

This study included 90 individuals with type 2 DM. The data analyzed covered the characteristics of the respondents, including gender, education, age, occupation, duration of illness, family support, and treatment adherence. Table 1 provides a complete breakdown of these characteristics.

Table 1. Distribution of Respondents Characteristics, Duration of Illness, Family Support, and Medication Adherence

Variable

n (90)

%

Gender

Male

38

42,2

Female

52

57.8

Age

<60 years old

69

76.7

≥60 years old

21

23.3

Education

Low level

70

77.8

High level

20

22.2

Occupation

Employed

36

40

Unemployed

54

60

Duration of illness

<2 years

32

35.6

≥2 years

58

64,4

Family support

Adequate

35

38.9

Good

55

61.1

Adherence

Low

22

24.4

High

68

75.6

Based on Table 1, the majority of the respondents were female (57.8%), below 60 years old (83.3%), had a low level of education (83.3%), were unemployed (52.2%), had a duration of illness of two years or more (64.4%), received good family support (61.1%), and demonstrated high medication adherence (75.6%). However, there was still a 24.4% non-adherence rate among DM patients.

Table 2 shows that the simple logistic regression analysis identified four factors significantly influencing medication adherence among DM patients (p<0.05). Age was a significant predictor (p=0.007, OR=0.232, 95% CI=0.80-0.67), indicating that younger patients were more likely to adhere to medication. Education level also played a significant role (p=0.048, OR=8.143, 95% CI=1.02-64.84), suggesting that patients with higher education levels were more likely to adhere to their treatment. Occupation was another influential factor (p=0.012, OR=3.659, 95% CI=1.30-10.01), with employed individuals showing higher adherence. Lastly, family support had a strong impact (p=0.002, OR=5.143, 95% CI=1.82-14.52), where patients with better family support were significantly more likely to follow their medication regimen. However, gender (p=0.259) and duration of illness (p=0.547) did not show a significant impact on medication adherence in this study (p>0.05), indicating that these factors were not strong predictors of adherence in the sample population.

Table 2. The Relationship Between Medication Adherence with Some Determinant

Variable

n (90)

Medication Adherence

OR

95% CI

p

Low

High

Sex

Male

38

7

31

0.557

0.20-1.54

0.259

Female

52

15

37

     

Age

<60 years

69

12

57

0.232

0.80-0.67

0.007*

≥60 years

21

10

11

     

Education

Low level

70

21

49

8.143

1.02-64.84

0.048*

High level

20

1

19

     

Occupation

Employed

36

14

22

3.659

1.30-10.01

0.012*

Unemployed

54

8

46

     

Duration of illness

<2 years

32

9

23

1.355

0.51-3.64

0.547

≥2 years

58

13

45

     

Family support

Adequate

35

15

20

5.143

1.82-14.52

0.002*

Good

55

7

48

     

*Significant.

Factors significantly influencing medication adherence were analyzed using multiple logistic regression to identify the most impactful factor. Table 3 shows that occupation emerged as the most influential factor in medication adherence (p=0.015, 95% CI=1.39-20.56). It indicates that employed individuals were significantly more likely to adhere to their medication regimen compared to unemployed. The wide confidence interval suggests a strong effect, although there may be some variability in the estimate.

Table 3. Multiple Regression Medication Adherence with Some Determinant

Variable

β

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Age

-21.582

0.000

0.00-0,01

0.998

Education

22.919

898

0.00-0,01

0.998

Occupation

1.675

5.338

1.39-20.56

0.015*

Family support

0.880

2.410

0.66-8.81

0.184

Constant

-4.733

     

*Significant.

DISCUSSION

The research results indicate that 24.4% of respondents have low adherence, 41.1% of diabetes mellitus patients have forgotten to take their medication at some point, 33.3% did not take their medication in the last two weeks, and 37.8% forgot to bring their medication when traveling. These findings align with other studies [27], which reported that nearly half of the respondents (44.9%) were non-adherent to their prescribed medication. Additionally, 22.5% had poor medication adherence, while the remainder fell into moderate and high adherence categories [28].

Four factors significantly influence medication adherence among diabetes mellitus patients, namely age, education, occupation, and family support, whereas gender and duration of illness do not. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified occupation as a significant factor influencing medication adherence, with a p-value of 0.015 (95% CI 1.39-20.56). Age and education level were found to be associated with adherence, which is consistent with the previous findings [27]. However, this contrasts with another study that found no association between age, education level, and medication adherence in diabetes mellitus patients [28]. Among respondents aged over 60 years, 11 (52%) were classified as having high adherence. Higher adherence rates increase with age [29]. As individuals age, the risk of developing various chronic diseases increases. Comorbidity can influence adherence by increasing awareness of a particular illness [30].

Additionally, 19 (95%) of respondents with higher education levels had high adherence, indicating that higher education correlates with better information absorption and behavior. Behavior is influenced by predisposing factors such as knowledge; better knowledge leads to better behavior [17]. The occupation was associated with adherence, corroborating previous findings that reported a statistically significant relationship between socioeconomic class and adherence [31]. However, this is contrary to the findings [28, 32] that found no association between occupation and adherence levels. Employed individuals tend to have less time to visit healthcare facilities, while unemployed individuals are generally more adherent due to having more time for healthcare visits.

Family support, referring to verbal information, goals, tangible assistance, or actions provided by individuals familiar with the issue, plays a role in the social environment. The interconnectedness between family and the environment is known as family support [33]. Family support can impact the health of individuals with chronic diseases, as indicated by a study conducted in Klaten, Indonesia. Patients are more motivated to maintain their health if they have good communication and family coping mechanisms [34]. Family support is one of the reinforcing factors that contribute to adherence behavior. Individuals can manage their health better at home due to the family’s ability to identify health problems, make decisions, offer care, maintain and improve household health, and locate necessary medical facilities [35]. Those receiving family support are more likely to follow medical advice compared to those without such support. Thus, family and social support are crucial for addressing health issues [36]. A study in Sukabumi found a significant relationship between family support and medication adherence among diabetes mellitus patients at the Internal Medicine Clinic of R. Syamsudin, S.H. Hospital, with a chi-square test p-value of 0.000 [37].

Addressing the issue of non-adherence among DM patients, healthcare providers should develop targeted educational programs, especially for older patients and those with lower education levels, emphasizing the importance of medication adherence. Involving family members in patient care is essential, as family support plays a crucial role. Workplaces should offer flexibility to help patients manage their treatment schedules. Regular monitoring and community-based interventions, such as medication reminders or visits by healthcare workers, can significantly improve adherence.

Limitations of the research

Researchers have been unable to control other factors that may affect medication adherence in this study, namely participation in health insurance, disease knowledge, access affordability to health services, health worker’s role, and motivation to look for treatment.

Directions for further research

Further research is needed to measure the various factors that influence medication adherence.

CONCLUSION

There is still a 24.4% non-adherence rate among DM patients in Central Java, Indonesia. Four factors may influence medication adherence among diabetes mellitus patients, namely age, education, occupation, and family support, while gender and duration of illness have no significant impact in this study.

OTHER INFORMATION

The source of financing. The authors’ funding to carry out the research.

Conflicts of interests. No conflicts of interest.

Author’s contribution. Puji Lestari – the concept or study design or to the obtaining, data analysis, or interpreting results, making significant changes to the manuscript; Liyanovitasari – the concept of study, writing an article, Heri Prabowo – the concept of study, writing an article. The authors approved the article’s final version before publication. They consented to be responsible for all aspects of the work, which implies proper resolution and investigation of its accuracy and integrity issues.

Acknowledgments. The author would like to express gratitude to the Head and staff members of Kalinyamatan Jepara Community Health Center; all the respondents who participated in this study; and the Nursing Undergraduate Program, Faculty of Health, Universitas Ngudi Waluyo.

References

1. World Health Organization. [Internet]. Noncommunicable diseases in emergencies. World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2024 Sep 10]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/204627

2. Animaw W, Seyoum Y. Increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a developing country and its related factors. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187670. Published 2017 Nov 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187670

3. International Diabetes Federation [Internet]. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 19th Edition; 2019 [cited 2024 Sep 10]. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_IDFATLAS9e-final-web.pdf

4. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan [National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia] [Internet]. Laporan Nasional Riskesdas 2018 [Basic Health Research Report 2018]. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 14]. Available from: http://labdata.litbang.kemkes.go.id/images/download/laporan/RKD/2018/Laporan_Nasional_RKD2018_FINAL.pdf

5. Dinkes Jateng D. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2020. Dinkes Jateng; 2020.

6. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S14-S31. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S002

7. Ligita T, Wicking K, Francis K, Harvey N, Nurjannah I. How people living with diabetes in Indonesia learn about their disease: A grounded theory study. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212019

8. Perkeni. Konsesus Pengolahan Dan Pencegahan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Di Indonesia. Perkeni 2011. 2011;1(69):5-24.

9. Lin LK, Sun Y, Heng BH, Chew DEK, Chong PN. Medication adherence and glycemic control among newly diagnosed diabetes patients. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000429

10. Basu S, Garg S, Sharma N, Singh MM, Garg S. Adherence to selfcare practices, glycemic status and influencing factors in diabetes patients in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. World J Diabetes. 2018;9(5):72-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v9.i5.72

11. Adikusuma W, Qiyaam N. Adherence level and blood sugar control of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who gets counseling and short messages service as reminder and motivation. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018;11(2):219. doi: https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i2.22988

12. Aminde LN, Tindong M, Ngwasiri CA, et al. Adherence to antidiabetic medication and factors associated with nonadherence among patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus in two regional hospitals in Cameroon. BMC Endocr Disord. 2019;19(1):35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0360-9

13. Bagonza J, Rutebemberwa E, Bazeyo W. Adherence to anti diabetic medication among patients with diabetes in eastern Uganda; a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0820-5

14. Kemenkes RI. Pedoman Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Indonesia. Perkeni; 2015.

15. Mubarak WI. Ilmu Keperawatan Komunitas 2: Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Praktik dengan Pendekatan Asuhan Keperawatan Komunitas, Gerontik dan Keluarga. 2nd ed. Sagung Seta; 2017.

16. Budiman D, Herlina N. Hubungan status demografi dengan kepuasan masyarakat tentang pelayanan Jamkesmas di wilayah Puskesmas Tanjungsari Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Kesehatan Kartika. 2010;2(7):1-13.

17. Notoatmodjo S. Promosi Kesehatan Dan Perilaku Kesehatan. Rineka cipta; 2018.

18. Suprianto, Purnawan, Arna, Kuspiantiningsih K. Dukungan Sosial Keluarga dengan Kepatuhan Menjalankan Program Pengobatan Pasien Hipertensi di URJ Jantung RSU Dr. Soetomo Surabaya. Jurnal Keperawatan. 2019;2(2).

19. Ihwatun S, Ginandjar P, Saraswati LD, Udiyono A. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kepatuhan Pengobatan Pada Penderita Hipertensi Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Pudakpayung Kota Semarang Tahun 2019. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2020;8(3):352-359. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jkm.v8i3.26396

20. Kalogianni A. Factors affect in patient adherence to medication regimen. Health Science Journal. 2011;5:157-158.

21. Aloudah NM, Scott NW, Aljadhey HS, Araujo-Soares V, Alrubeaan KA, Watson MC. Medication adherence among patients with Type 2 diabetes: A mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0207583. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207583

22. Yazew KG, Walle TA, Azagew AW. Prevalence of antidiabetic medication adherence and determinant factors in Ethiopia: A systemic review and meta-analysis, 2019. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2019;11:100167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2019.100167

23. Almeida C, Rocha C, Cruz R. Impact of adverse effects to oral antidiabetics on adherence and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. European Journal of Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_2):ckaa040.020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa040.020

24. Mohamed MR, Ramsdale E, Loh KP, et al. Associations of Polypharmacy and Inappropriate Medications with Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2020;25(1):e94-e108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0406

25. Procidano ME, Heller K. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol. 1983;11(1):1-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00898416

26. Al-Qazaz HKh, Hassali MA, Shafie AA, Sulaiman SA, Sundram S, Morisky DE. The eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale MMAS: translation and validation of the Malaysian version. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;90(2):216-221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2010.08.012

27. Bekalu AF, Yenit MK, Tekile MT, Birarra MK. Medication-related burden and associated factors among diabetes mellitus patients at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in northwest Ethiopia. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022;3:977216. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2022.977216

28. Abhilash, Dsouza DJ, S S, et al. Factors influencing adherence towards oral hypoglycaemic agents- A cross-sectional study among patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Epidemiology and Management. 2023;12:100163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.deman.2023.100163

29. Huber CA, Reich O. Medication adherence in patients with diabetes mellitus: does physician drug dispensing enhance quality of care? Evidence from a large health claims database in Switzerland. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1803-1809. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S115425

30. Cho SJ, Kim J. Factors associated with nonadherence to antihypertensive medication. Nurs Health Sci. 2014;16(4):461-467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12145

31. Aravindakshan R, Abraham SB, Aiyappan R. Medication Adherence to Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - A Community Study. Indian J Community Med. 2021;46(3):503-507. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_985_20

32. Alqarni AM, Alrahbeni T, Qarni AA, Qarni HMA. Adherence to diabetes medication among diabetic patients in the Bisha governorate of Saudi Arabia - a cross-sectional survey [published correction appears in Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Feb 08;13:249. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S201661.]. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;13:63-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S176355

33. Setiadi. Konsep & Proses Keperawatan Keluarga. Graha Ilmu; 2008.

34. Arifin, SD. Hubungan Dukungan Keluarga dengan Kepatuhan Diet Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Poli Penyakit Dalam RSUP Dr. Soeradji Tirtonegoro Klaten. Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta. 2015;2(2):1–18.

35. Friedman MM, Bowden VR, Jones EG. Buku Ajar Keperawatan Keluarga: Riset, Teori & Praktik. 5th ed. EGC; 2014.

36. Sarafino EP. Edward. Health Psychology Biopsychology Interaction. Third Edition. John Willey and Sans; 2014.

37. Anggraeni R. Hubungan Dukungan Keluarga dengan Kepatuhan Minum Obat Pasien DM di Poli Penyakit Dalam RSUD. R. Syamsudin, S.H. Kota Sukabumi. Journal Health Society. 2021;11(1):133-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.62094/jhs.v11i1.43


About the Authors

Puji Lestari
Universitas Ngudi Waluyo
Indonesia

Puji Lestari, BScN, RN, MNSc (Epid)

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health

186 Diponegoro Street, 50512 Gedanganak, East Ungaran, Semarang, Central Java



. Liyanovitasari
Universitas Ngudi Waluyo
Indonesia

Liyanovitasari, BScN, RN, MNSc

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health

186 Diponegoro Street, 50512 Gedanganak, East Ungaran, Semarang, Central Java



Heri Prabowo
Universitas PGRI Semarang
Indonesia

Heri Prabowo, PhD, BSc (Economics), MSc (Management)

Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics

Semarang



Review

For citations:


Lestari P., Liyanovitasari , Prabowo H. Medication Adherence in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Influencing Factors in Indonesia. Diabetes mellitus. 2025;28(2):237-242. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13068

Views: 411


ISSN 2072-0351 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0378 (Online)