diaendoСахарный диабетDiabetes mellitus2072-03512072-0378Endocrinology research centrediaendo-13543Research ArticleСтатьиArticlesКлинические рекомендации. Сахарный диабет 1 типа у детейКлинические рекомендации. Сахарный диабет 1 типа у детейПетерковаВалентина АлександровнаПетерковаВалентина Александровна

д.м.н., профессор, академик РАН, научный руководитель Института детской эндокринологии, заведующая кафедрой детской эндокринологии-диабетологии, главный внештатный специалист детский эндокринолог Минздрава России

БезлепкинаОльга БорисовнаБезлепкинаОльга Борисовна

д.м.н., директор Института детской эндокринологии, профессор кафедры детской эндокринологии-диабетологии

ЛаптевДмитрий НикитичЛаптевДмитрий Никитич

д.м.н., профессор РАН, заведующий детским отделением сахарного диабета, доцент кафедры детской эндокринологии-диабетологии

КураеваТамара ЛеонидовнаКураеваТамара Леонидовна

д.м.н., профессор, главный научный сотрудник детского отделения сахарного диабета

ЕреминаИрина АлександровнаЕреминаИрина Александровна

к.м.н., научный сотрудник детского отделения сахарного диабета

ТитовичЕлена ВитальевнаТитовичЕлена Витальевна

к.м.н., ведущий научный сотрудник детского отделения сахарного диабета, доцент кафедры детской эндокринологии-диабетологии

ЕмельяновАндрей ОлеговичЕмельяновАндрей Олегович

к.м.н., ведущий научный сотрудник детского отделения сахарного диабета

СветловаГалина НиколаевнаСветловаГалина Николаевна

к.м.н., ведущий научный сотрудник детского отделения сахарного диабета

ФГБУ «НМИЦ эндокринологии» Минздрава РоссииRussian Federation202527072026286SКЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ. САХАРНЫЙ ДИАБЕТ 1 ТИПА У ДЕТЕЙ150Copyright © Петеркова В.А., Безлепкина О.Б., Лаптев Д.Н., Кураева Т.Л., Еремина И.А., Титович Е.В., Емельянов А.О., Светлова Г.Н., 20262026Петеркова В.А., Безлепкина О.Б., Лаптев Д.Н., Кураева Т.Л., Еремина И.А., Титович Е.В., Емельянов А.О., Светлова Г.Н.Петеркова В.А., Безлепкина О.Б., Лаптев Д.Н., Кураева Т.Л., Еремина И.А., Титович Е.В., Емельянов А.О., Светлова Г.Н.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.dia-endojournals.ru/jour/article/view/13543

.

ReferencesДедов И.И., Кураева Т.Л., Петеркова В.А. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. 271 p.Дедов И.И., Кураева Т.Л., Петеркова В.А. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. 271 p.Bingley P.J. Clinical Applications of Diabetes Antibody Testing // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010. Vol. 95, № 1. P. 25–33.Bingley P.J. Clinical Applications of Diabetes Antibody Testing // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010. Vol. 95, № 1. P. 25–33.Noble J.A., Erlich H.A. Genetics of Type 1 Diabetes // Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012. Vol. 2, № 1. P. a007732–a007732.Noble J.A., Erlich H.A. Genetics of Type 1 Diabetes // Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012. Vol. 2, № 1. P. a007732–a007732.Абрамов, Д.Д. et al. Сравнение вклада системы HLA и других генов иммунного ответа в формирование генетической предрасположенности к развитию сахарного диабета 1-го типа // Иммунология. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 4–6.Абрамов, Д.Д. et al. Сравнение вклада системы HLA и других генов иммунного ответа в формирование генетической предрасположенности к развитию сахарного диабета 1-го типа // Иммунология. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 4–6.Дедов И.И. et al. Генетические факторы в развитии СД 1 типа в России // Молекулярная Медицина. 2003. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 31–37.Дедов И.И. et al. Генетические факторы в развитии СД 1 типа в России // Молекулярная Медицина. 2003. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 31–37.Кураева Т.Л. et al. Роль генетических факторов в формировании разного уровня заболеваемости сахарным диабетом 1-го типа в Европе и Российской Федерации // Проблемы Эндокринологии. 2011. Vol. 57, № 1. P. 19–25.Кураева Т.Л. et al. Роль генетических факторов в формировании разного уровня заболеваемости сахарным диабетом 1-го типа в Европе и Российской Федерации // Проблемы Эндокринологии. 2011. Vol. 57, № 1. P. 19–25.Титович Е.В. et al. Ассоциация сахарного диабета 1 типа с полиморфными аллелями генов HLA класса II в якутской и русской популяциях // Сахарный Диабет. 2009. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 26–32.Титович Е.В. et al. Ассоциация сахарного диабета 1 типа с полиморфными аллелями генов HLA класса II в якутской и русской популяциях // Сахарный Диабет. 2009. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 26–32.International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2021.International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2021.Mayer-Davis E.J. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 7–19.Mayer-Davis E.J. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 7–19.Александрова Г.А. et al. Общая заболеваемость детского населения России (0–14 лет) в 2019 году. Статистические материалы. Часть VI. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Александрова Г.А. et al. Общая заболеваемость детского населения России (0–14 лет) в 2019 году. Статистические материалы. Часть VI. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Александрова Г.А. et al. Заболеваемость детского населения России (0–14 лет) в 2019 году с диагнозом, установленным впервые в жизни. Статистические материалы. Часть V. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Александрова Г.А. et al. Заболеваемость детского населения России (0–14 лет) в 2019 году с диагнозом, установленным впервые в жизни. Статистические материалы. Часть V. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Александрова Г.А. et al. Заболеваемость детского населения России (15–17 лет) в 2019 году с диагнозом, установленным впервые в жизни. Статистические материалы. Часть IX. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Александрова Г.А. et al. Заболеваемость детского населения России (15–17 лет) в 2019 году с диагнозом, установленным впервые в жизни. Статистические материалы. Часть IX. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Александрова Г.А. et al. Общая заболеваемость детского населения России (15–17 лет) в 2019 году. Статистические материалы. Часть Х. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Александрова Г.А. et al. Общая заболеваемость детского населения России (15–17 лет) в 2019 году. Статистические материалы. Часть Х. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Викулова О.К. Эпидемиология сахарного диабета в Российской Федерации: клинико-статистический анализ по данным Федерального регистра сахарного диабета. 2017. Vol. 1, № 20. P. 13–41.Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Викулова О.К. Эпидемиология сахарного диабета в Российской Федерации: клинико-статистический анализ по данным Федерального регистра сахарного диабета. 2017. Vol. 1, № 20. P. 13–41.Дедов И.И. et al. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков по данным Федерального регистра Российской Федерации: динамика основных эпидемиологических характеристик за 2013-2016 гг. // Сахарный Диабет. 2017. Vol. 20, № 6. P. 392–402.Дедов И.И. et al. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков по данным Федерального регистра Российской Федерации: динамика основных эпидемиологических характеристик за 2013-2016 гг. // Сахарный Диабет. 2017. Vol. 20, № 6. P. 392–402.Libman I. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1160–1174.Libman I. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1160–1174.World Health Organization. Classification of diabetes mellitus. 2019.World Health Organization. Classification of diabetes mellitus. 2019.American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021 // Diabetes Care. 2021. Vol. 44, № Supplement 1. P. S15–S33.American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021 // Diabetes Care. 2021. Vol. 44, № Supplement 1. P. S15–S33.World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. 2006.World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. 2006.Insel R.A. et al. Staging Presymptomatic Type 1 Diabetes: A Scientific Statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. 2015. Vol. 38, № 10. P. 1964–1974.Insel R.A. et al. Staging Presymptomatic Type 1 Diabetes: A Scientific Statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. 2015. Vol. 38, № 10. P. 1964–1974.Ziegler A.G. et al. Seroconversion to Multiple Islet Autoantibodies and Risk of Progression to Diabetes in Children // JAMA. 2013. Vol. 309, № 23. P. 2473.Ziegler A.G. et al. Seroconversion to Multiple Islet Autoantibodies and Risk of Progression to Diabetes in Children // JAMA. 2013. Vol. 309, № 23. P. 2473.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee et al. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 // Diabetes Care. 2025. Vol. 48, № Supplement_1. P. S27–S49.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee et al. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 // Diabetes Care. 2025. Vol. 48, № Supplement_1. P. S27–S49.Phillip M. et al. Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes // Diabetologia. 2024. Vol. 67, № 9. P. 1731–1759.Phillip M. et al. Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes // Diabetologia. 2024. Vol. 67, № 9. P. 1731–1759.American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S13–S27.American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S13–S27.Besser R.E.J. et al. Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Stages of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1175–1187.Besser R.E.J. et al. Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Stages of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1175–1187.Hummel S. et al. Children diagnosed with presymptomatic type 1 diabetes through public health screening have milder diabetes at clinical manifestation // Diabetologia. 2023. Vol. 66, № 9. P. 1633–1642.Hummel S. et al. Children diagnosed with presymptomatic type 1 diabetes through public health screening have milder diabetes at clinical manifestation // Diabetologia. 2023. Vol. 66, № 9. P. 1633–1642.Winkler C. et al. Markedly reduced rate of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in relatives screened for islet autoantibodies: Diabetic ketoacidosis at onset // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 308–313.Winkler C. et al. Markedly reduced rate of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in relatives screened for islet autoantibodies: Diabetic ketoacidosis at onset // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 308–313.Hekkala A.M. et al. Ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: Effect of prospective studies with newborn genetic screening and follow up of risk children // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 2. P. 314–319.Hekkala A.M. et al. Ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: Effect of prospective studies with newborn genetic screening and follow up of risk children // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 2. P. 314–319.Ziegler A.-G. et al. Yield of a Public Health Screening of Children for Islet Autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany // JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323, № 4. P. 339.Ziegler A.-G. et al. Yield of a Public Health Screening of Children for Islet Autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany // JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323, № 4. P. 339.Gibb F.W. et al. Risk of death following admission to a UK hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis // Diabetologia. 2016. Vol. 59, № 10. P. 2082–2087.Gibb F.W. et al. Risk of death following admission to a UK hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis // Diabetologia. 2016. Vol. 59, № 10. P. 2082–2087.Virdi N. et al. Prevalence, Cost, and Burden of Diabetic Ketoacidosis // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2023. Vol. 25, № S3. P. S-75-S-84.Virdi N. et al. Prevalence, Cost, and Burden of Diabetic Ketoacidosis // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2023. Vol. 25, № S3. P. S-75-S-84.Gaudieri P.A. et al. Cognitive Function in Children With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. 1892–1897.Gaudieri P.A. et al. Cognitive Function in Children With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. 1892–1897.Rawshani A. et al. Excess mortality and cardiovascular disease in young adults with type 1 diabetes in relation to age at onset: a nationwide, register-based cohort study // The Lancet. 2018. Vol. 392, № 10146. P. 477–486.Rawshani A. et al. Excess mortality and cardiovascular disease in young adults with type 1 diabetes in relation to age at onset: a nationwide, register-based cohort study // The Lancet. 2018. Vol. 392, № 10146. P. 477–486.Herold K.C. et al. An Anti-CD3 Antibody, Teplizumab, in Relatives at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes // N. Engl. J. Med. 2019. Vol. 381, № 7. P. 603–613.Herold K.C. et al. An Anti-CD3 Antibody, Teplizumab, in Relatives at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes // N. Engl. J. Med. 2019. Vol. 381, № 7. P. 603–613.Sims E.K. et al. Teplizumab improves and stabilizes beta cell function in antibody-positive high-risk individuals // Sci. Transl. Med. 2021. Vol. 13, № 583. P. eabc8980.Sims E.K. et al. Teplizumab improves and stabilizes beta cell function in antibody-positive high-risk individuals // Sci. Transl. Med. 2021. Vol. 13, № 583. P. eabc8980.Watkins R.A. et al. Established and emerging biomarkers for the prediction of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review // Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2014. Vol. 164, № 2. P. 110–121.Watkins R.A. et al. Established and emerging biomarkers for the prediction of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review // Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2014. Vol. 164, № 2. P. 110–121.Dabelea D. et al. Etiological Approach to Characterization of Diabetes Type: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 7. P. 1628–1633.Dabelea D. et al. Etiological Approach to Characterization of Diabetes Type: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 7. P. 1628–1633.Лаптев Д.Н. et al. Модель клинического прогнозирования сахарного диабета MODY типа у детей // Сахарный Диабет. 2024. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 33–40.Лаптев Д.Н. et al. Модель клинического прогнозирования сахарного диабета MODY типа у детей // Сахарный Диабет. 2024. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 33–40.Zeitler P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 28–46.Zeitler P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 28–46.Ziegler R. et al. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 11–17.Ziegler R. et al. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 11–17.DiMeglio L.A. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 105–114.DiMeglio L.A. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 105–114.Battelino T. et al. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 8. P. 1593–1603.Battelino T. et al. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 8. P. 1593–1603.Writing Group for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group et al. Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality // JAMA. 2015. Vol. 313, № 1. P. 45–53.Writing Group for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group et al. Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality // JAMA. 2015. Vol. 313, № 1. P. 45–53.Writing Team for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group et al. Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy and Risk Factors on Patient-Reported Visual Function Outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Cohort // JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016. Vol. 134, № 2. P. 137–145.Writing Team for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group et al. Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy and Risk Factors on Patient-Reported Visual Function Outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Cohort // JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016. Vol. 134, № 2. P. 137–145.de Bock M. et al. International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024: Glycemic Targets // Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2024. Vol. 97, № 6. P. 546–554.de Bock M. et al. International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024: Glycemic Targets // Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2024. Vol. 97, № 6. P. 546–554.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee et al. 6. Glycemic Goals and Hypoglycemia: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024 // Diabetes Care. 2024. Vol. 47, № Supplement_1. P. S111–S125.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee et al. 6. Glycemic Goals and Hypoglycemia: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024 // Diabetes Care. 2024. Vol. 47, № Supplement_1. P. S111–S125.Karges B. et al. Hemoglobin A1c Levels and risk of severe hypoglycemia in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes from Germany and Austria: a trend analysis in a cohort of 37,539 patients between 1995 and 2012 // PLoS Med. 2014. Vol. 11, № 10. P. e1001742.Karges B. et al. Hemoglobin A1c Levels and risk of severe hypoglycemia in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes from Germany and Austria: a trend analysis in a cohort of 37,539 patients between 1995 and 2012 // PLoS Med. 2014. Vol. 11, № 10. P. e1001742.Beck R.W. et al. Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 3. P. 400–405.Beck R.W. et al. Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 3. P. 400–405.Ranjan A.G. et al. Improved Time in Range Over 1 Year Is Associated With Reduced Albuminuria in Individuals With Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump–Treated Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 11. P. 2882–2885.Ranjan A.G. et al. Improved Time in Range Over 1 Year Is Associated With Reduced Albuminuria in Individuals With Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump–Treated Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 11. P. 2882–2885.de Bock M. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Glycemic targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young people with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1270–1276.de Bock M. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Glycemic targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young people with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1270–1276.Liu M. et al. A randomised, open-labelstudy of insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in Chinese paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus // BMC Endocr. Disord. 2016. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 67.Liu M. et al. A randomised, open-labelstudy of insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in Chinese paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus // BMC Endocr. Disord. 2016. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 67.Schober E. et al. Comparative trial between insulin glargine and NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus // J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. JPEM. 2002. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 369–376.Schober E. et al. Comparative trial between insulin glargine and NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus // J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. JPEM. 2002. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 369–376.Danne T. et al. Pharmacokinetics, prandial glucose control, and safety of insulin glulisine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2005. Vol. 28, № 9. P. 2100–2105.Danne T. et al. Pharmacokinetics, prandial glucose control, and safety of insulin glulisine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2005. Vol. 28, № 9. P. 2100–2105.Philotheou A. et al. Comparable Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glulisine and Insulin Lispro When Given as Part of a Basal–Bolus Insulin Regimen in a 26-Week Trial in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2011. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 327–334.Philotheou A. et al. Comparable Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glulisine and Insulin Lispro When Given as Part of a Basal–Bolus Insulin Regimen in a 26-Week Trial in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2011. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 327–334.Holcombe J.H. et al. Comparison of insulin lispro with regular human insulin for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in adolescents // Clin. Ther. 2002. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 629–638.Holcombe J.H. et al. Comparison of insulin lispro with regular human insulin for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in adolescents // Clin. Ther. 2002. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 629–638.Tupola S. et al. Post-prandial insulin lispro vs. human regular insulin in prepubertal children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2001. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 654–658.Tupola S. et al. Post-prandial insulin lispro vs. human regular insulin in prepubertal children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2001. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 654–658.Rutledge K.S. et al. Effectiveness of Postprandial Humalog in Toddlers With Diabetes // PEDIATRICS. 1997. Vol. 100, № 6. P. 968–972.Rutledge K.S. et al. Effectiveness of Postprandial Humalog in Toddlers With Diabetes // PEDIATRICS. 1997. Vol. 100, № 6. P. 968–972.Deeb L.C. et al. Insulin Lispro Lowers Postprandial Glucose in Prepubertal Children With Diabetes // PEDIATRICS. 2001. Vol. 108, № 5. P. 1175–1179.Deeb L.C. et al. Insulin Lispro Lowers Postprandial Glucose in Prepubertal Children With Diabetes // PEDIATRICS. 2001. Vol. 108, № 5. P. 1175–1179.Battelino T. et al. Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A randomized trial // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1263–1270.Battelino T. et al. Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A randomized trial // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1263–1270.Predieri B. et al. Switching From Glargine to Degludec: The Effect on Metabolic Control and Safety During 1-Year of Real Clinical Practice in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes // Front. Endocrinol. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 462.Predieri B. et al. Switching From Glargine to Degludec: The Effect on Metabolic Control and Safety During 1-Year of Real Clinical Practice in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes // Front. Endocrinol. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 462.Thalange N. et al. The rate of hyperglycemia and ketosis with insulin degludec‐based treatment compared with insulin detemir in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: An analysis of data from two randomized trials // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2019. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 314–320.Thalange N. et al. The rate of hyperglycemia and ketosis with insulin degludec‐based treatment compared with insulin detemir in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: An analysis of data from two randomized trials // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2019. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 314–320.Thalange N. et al. Insulin degludec in combination with bolus insulin aspart is safe and effective in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: IDeg effective and safe in pediatric T1D // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2015. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 164–176.Thalange N. et al. Insulin degludec in combination with bolus insulin aspart is safe and effective in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: IDeg effective and safe in pediatric T1D // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2015. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 164–176.Danne T. et al. Insulin detemir is characterized by a consistent pharmacokinetic profile across age-groups in children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2003. Vol. 26, № 11. P. 3087–3092.Danne T. et al. Insulin detemir is characterized by a consistent pharmacokinetic profile across age-groups in children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2003. Vol. 26, № 11. P. 3087–3092.Robertson K.J. et al. Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2007. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 27–34.Robertson K.J. et al. Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2007. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 27–34.Fath M. et al. Faster-acting insulin aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure vs insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: FATH ET AL . // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2017. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 903–910.Fath M. et al. Faster-acting insulin aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure vs insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: FATH ET AL . // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2017. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 903–910.Bode B.W. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Compared With Insulin Aspart, Both in Combination With Insulin Degludec, in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: The onset 7 Trial // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 7. P. 1255–1262.Bode B.W. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Compared With Insulin Aspart, Both in Combination With Insulin Degludec, in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: The onset 7 Trial // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 7. P. 1255–1262.Danne T. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL (Gla-300) Versus Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL (Gla-100) in Children and Adolescents (6-17 years) With Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the EDITION JUNIOR Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 7. P. 1512–1519.Danne T. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL (Gla-300) Versus Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL (Gla-100) in Children and Adolescents (6-17 years) With Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the EDITION JUNIOR Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 7. P. 1512–1519.Дедов И.И. et al. Проект рекомендаций Российской ассоциации эндокринологов по применению биосимиляров инсулина. 2021. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 76–79.Дедов И.И. et al. Проект рекомендаций Российской ассоциации эндокринологов по применению биосимиляров инсулина. 2021. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 76–79.Danne T. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Insulin treatment in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 115–135.Danne T. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Insulin treatment in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 115–135.Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group // J. Pediatr. 1994. Vol. 125, № 2. P. 177–188.Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group // J. Pediatr. 1994. Vol. 125, № 2. P. 177–188.Musen G. et al. Impact of diabetes and its treatment on cognitive function among adolescents who participated in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 10. P. 1933–1938.Musen G. et al. Impact of diabetes and its treatment on cognitive function among adolescents who participated in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 10. P. 1933–1938.White N.H. et al. Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) // J. Pediatr. 2001. Vol. 139, № 6. P. 804–812.White N.H. et al. Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) // J. Pediatr. 2001. Vol. 139, № 6. P. 804–812.Pop-Busui R. et al. Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy on Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System Function in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study (DCCT/EDIC) // Circulation. 2009. Vol. 119, № 22. P. 2886–2893.Pop-Busui R. et al. Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy on Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System Function in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study (DCCT/EDIC) // Circulation. 2009. Vol. 119, № 22. P. 2886–2893.Nørgaard K. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Diabetes Ther. 2018. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 891–917.Nørgaard K. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Diabetes Ther. 2018. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 891–917.Chase H.P. et al. Reduced hypoglycemic episodes and improved glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes using insulin glargine and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin // J. Pediatr. 2003. Vol. 143, № 6. P. 737–740.Chase H.P. et al. Reduced hypoglycemic episodes and improved glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes using insulin glargine and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin // J. Pediatr. 2003. Vol. 143, № 6. P. 737–740.Frid A.H. et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016. Vol. 91, № 9. P. 1231–1255.Frid A.H. et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016. Vol. 91, № 9. P. 1231–1255.Birkebaek N.H. et al. A 4-mm Needle Reduces the Risk of Intramuscular Injections Without Increasing Backflow to Skin Surface in Lean Diabetic Children and Adults // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. e65.Birkebaek N.H. et al. A 4-mm Needle Reduces the Risk of Intramuscular Injections Without Increasing Backflow to Skin Surface in Lean Diabetic Children and Adults // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. e65.Майоров А.Ю. et al. Техника инъекций и инфузии при лечении сахарного диабета. Методическое руководство. Москва: ООО «АРТИНФО», 2018. 64 p.Майоров А.Ю. et al. Техника инъекций и инфузии при лечении сахарного диабета. Методическое руководство. Москва: ООО «АРТИНФО», 2018. 64 p.Birkebaek N.H. et al. A 4-mm needle reduces the risk of intramuscular injections without increasing backflow to skin surface in lean diabetic children and adults // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. e65.Birkebaek N.H. et al. A 4-mm needle reduces the risk of intramuscular injections without increasing backflow to skin surface in lean diabetic children and adults // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. e65.Hofman P.L. et al. Defining the ideal injection techniques when using 5-mm needles in children and adults // Diabetes Care. 2010. Vol. 33, № 9. P. 1940–1944.Hofman P.L. et al. Defining the ideal injection techniques when using 5-mm needles in children and adults // Diabetes Care. 2010. Vol. 33, № 9. P. 1940–1944.Frid A.H. et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016. Vol. 91, № 9. P. 1231–1255.Frid A.H. et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016. Vol. 91, № 9. P. 1231–1255.Lo Presti D., Ingegnosi C., Strauss K. Skin and subcutaneous thickness at injecting sites in children with diabetes: ultrasound findings and recommendations for giving injection // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 7. P. 525–533.Lo Presti D., Ingegnosi C., Strauss K. Skin and subcutaneous thickness at injecting sites in children with diabetes: ultrasound findings and recommendations for giving injection // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 7. P. 525–533.Zabaleta-del-Olmo E. et al. Safety of the reuse of needles for subcutaneous insulin injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016. Vol. 60. P. 121–132.Zabaleta-del-Olmo E. et al. Safety of the reuse of needles for subcutaneous insulin injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016. Vol. 60. P. 121–132.Pańkowska E. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs. multiple daily injections in children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2009. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 52–58.Pańkowska E. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs. multiple daily injections in children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2009. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 52–58.Benkhadra K. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Endocrine. 2017. Vol. 55, № 1. P. 77–84.Benkhadra K. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Endocrine. 2017. Vol. 55, № 1. P. 77–84.Pickup J.C., Sutton A.J. Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2008. Vol. 25, № 7. P. 765–774.Pickup J.C., Sutton A.J. Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2008. Vol. 25, № 7. P. 765–774.Vallejo-Mora M.D.R. et al. The Calculating Boluses on Multiple Daily Injections (CBMDI) study: A randomized controlled trial on the effect on metabolic control of adding a bolus calculator to multiple daily injections in people with type 1 diabetes // J. Diabetes. 2017. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 24–33.Vallejo-Mora M.D.R. et al. The Calculating Boluses on Multiple Daily Injections (CBMDI) study: A randomized controlled trial on the effect on metabolic control of adding a bolus calculator to multiple daily injections in people with type 1 diabetes // J. Diabetes. 2017. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 24–33.Vallejo Mora M.D.R. et al. Bolus Calculator Reduces Hypoglycemia in the Short Term and Fear of Hypoglycemia in the Long Term in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes (CBMDI Study) // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2017. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 402–409.Vallejo Mora M.D.R. et al. Bolus Calculator Reduces Hypoglycemia in the Short Term and Fear of Hypoglycemia in the Long Term in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes (CBMDI Study) // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2017. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 402–409.Ziegler R. et al. Use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control in multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy patients with suboptimal glycemic control: first results from the ABACUS trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 11. P. 3613–3619.Ziegler R. et al. Use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control in multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy patients with suboptimal glycemic control: first results from the ABACUS trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 11. P. 3613–3619.Schmidt S. et al. Use of an automated bolus calculator in MDI-treated type 1 diabetes: the BolusCal Study, a randomized controlled pilot study // Diabetes Care. 2012. Vol. 35, № 5. P. 984–990.Schmidt S. et al. Use of an automated bolus calculator in MDI-treated type 1 diabetes: the BolusCal Study, a randomized controlled pilot study // Diabetes Care. 2012. Vol. 35, № 5. P. 984–990.Ramotowska A. et al. The effect of using the insulin pump bolus calculator compared to standard insulin dosage calculations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus - systematic review // Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Off. J. Ger. Soc. Endocrinol. Ger. Diabetes Assoc. 2013. Vol. 121, № 5. P. 248–254.Ramotowska A. et al. The effect of using the insulin pump bolus calculator compared to standard insulin dosage calculations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus - systematic review // Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Off. J. Ger. Soc. Endocrinol. Ger. Diabetes Assoc. 2013. Vol. 121, № 5. P. 248–254.Wong J.C. et al. A Minority of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Routinely Downloads and Retrospectively Reviews Device Data // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015. Vol. 17, № 8. P. 555–562.Wong J.C. et al. A Minority of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Routinely Downloads and Retrospectively Reviews Device Data // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015. Vol. 17, № 8. P. 555–562.Slover R.H. et al. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the STAR 3 study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 6–11.Slover R.H. et al. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the STAR 3 study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 6–11.Ly T.T. et al. Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial // JAMA. 2013. Vol. 310, № 12. P. 1240–1247.Ly T.T. et al. Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial // JAMA. 2013. Vol. 310, № 12. P. 1240–1247.Abraham M.B. et al. Reduction in Hypoglycemia With the Predictive Low-Glucose Management System: A Long-term Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 2. P. 303–310.Abraham M.B. et al. Reduction in Hypoglycemia With the Predictive Low-Glucose Management System: A Long-term Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 2. P. 303–310.Battelino T. et al. Prevention of Hypoglycemia With Predictive Low Glucose Insulin Suspension in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2017. Vol. 40, № 6. P. 764–770.Battelino T. et al. Prevention of Hypoglycemia With Predictive Low Glucose Insulin Suspension in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2017. Vol. 40, № 6. P. 764–770.Sherr J.L. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes technologies // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 302–325.Sherr J.L. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes technologies // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 302–325.Phelan H. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes education in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 75–83.Phelan H. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes education in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 75–83.Błazik M., Pańkowska E. The effect of bolus and food calculator Diabetics on glucose variability in children with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump: the results of RCT // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 7. P. 534–539.Błazik M., Pańkowska E. The effect of bolus and food calculator Diabetics on glucose variability in children with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump: the results of RCT // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 7. P. 534–539.Miller K.M. et al. Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 7. P. 2009–2014.Miller K.M. et al. Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 7. P. 2009–2014.Ziegler R. et al. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 11–17.Ziegler R. et al. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 11–17.Bohn B. et al. 20 Years of Pediatric Benchmarking in Germany and Austria: Age-Dependent Analysis of Longitudinal Follow-Up in 63,967 Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes // PloS One. 2016. Vol. 11, № 8. P. e0160971.Bohn B. et al. 20 Years of Pediatric Benchmarking in Germany and Austria: Age-Dependent Analysis of Longitudinal Follow-Up in 63,967 Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes // PloS One. 2016. Vol. 11, № 8. P. e0160971.Battelino T. et al. The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial // Diabetologia. 2012. Vol. 55, № 12. P. 3155–3162.Battelino T. et al. The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial // Diabetologia. 2012. Vol. 55, № 12. P. 3155–3162.El-Laboudi A.H. et al. Measures of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes and the Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2016. Vol. 18, № 12. P. 806–812.El-Laboudi A.H. et al. Measures of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes and the Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2016. Vol. 18, № 12. P. 806–812.Bergenstal R.M. et al. Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction (STAR 3) Study: Results from the 6-month continuation phase // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 11. P. 2403–2405.Bergenstal R.M. et al. Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction (STAR 3) Study: Results from the 6-month continuation phase // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 11. P. 2403–2405.Piona C. et al. Non-adjunctive flash glucose monitoring system use during summer-camp in children with type 1 diabetes: The free-summer study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1285–1293.Piona C. et al. Non-adjunctive flash glucose monitoring system use during summer-camp in children with type 1 diabetes: The free-summer study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1285–1293.Campbell F.M. et al. Outcomes of using flash glucose monitoring technology by children and young people with type 1 diabetes in a single arm study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1294–1301.Campbell F.M. et al. Outcomes of using flash glucose monitoring technology by children and young people with type 1 diabetes in a single arm study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1294–1301.Hásková A. et al. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 11. P. 2744–2750.Hásková A. et al. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 11. P. 2744–2750.Laptev D.N. et al. The use of Flash glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in real clinical practice // Diabetes Mellit. 2021. Vol. 24, № 6. P. 504–510.Laptev D.N. et al. The use of Flash glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in real clinical practice // Diabetes Mellit. 2021. Vol. 24, № 6. P. 504–510.Петеркова В.А. et al. Оценка эффективности амбулаторного наблюдения детей и подростков с сахарным диабетом 1-го типа при регулярном использовании профессионального непрерывного мониторинга уровня глюкозы // Проблемы эндокринологии. 2020. Vol. 66, № 1. P. 14–22.Петеркова В.А. et al. Оценка эффективности амбулаторного наблюдения детей и подростков с сахарным диабетом 1-го типа при регулярном использовании профессионального непрерывного мониторинга уровня глюкозы // Проблемы эндокринологии. 2020. Vol. 66, № 1. P. 14–22.Von Sengbusch S. et al. Monthly video consultation for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic // Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022. Vol. 193. P. 110135.Von Sengbusch S. et al. Monthly video consultation for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic // Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022. Vol. 193. P. 110135.Kaushal T. et al. Improved CGM Glucometrics and More Visits for Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Using Telemedicine During 1 Year of COVID-19 // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022. Vol. 107, № 10. P. e4197–e4202.Kaushal T. et al. Improved CGM Glucometrics and More Visits for Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Using Telemedicine During 1 Year of COVID-19 // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022. Vol. 107, № 10. P. e4197–e4202.Kimbell B. et al. Parents’ views about healthcare professionals having real‐time remote access to their young child’s diabetes data: Qualitative study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 6. P. 799–808.Kimbell B. et al. Parents’ views about healthcare professionals having real‐time remote access to their young child’s diabetes data: Qualitative study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 6. P. 799–808.Pickup J.C., Freeman S.C., Sutton A.J. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data // BMJ. 2011. Vol. 343. P. d3805.Pickup J.C., Freeman S.C., Sutton A.J. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data // BMJ. 2011. Vol. 343. P. d3805.Battelino T. et al. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 795–800.Battelino T. et al. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 795–800.Hirsch I.B. et al. Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to-target study // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2008. Vol. 10, № 5. P. 377–383.Hirsch I.B. et al. Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to-target study // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2008. Vol. 10, № 5. P. 377–383.Лаптев Д.Н. et al. Результаты клинической апробации системы FreeStyle Libre у детей с сахарным диабетом 1 типа: улучшение гликемического контроля в сочетании со снижением риска тяжелой гипогликемии и диабетического кетоацидоза // Проблемы Эндокринологии. 2022. Vol. 68, № 3. P. 86–92.Лаптев Д.Н. et al. Результаты клинической апробации системы FreeStyle Libre у детей с сахарным диабетом 1 типа: улучшение гликемического контроля в сочетании со снижением риска тяжелой гипогликемии и диабетического кетоацидоза // Проблемы Эндокринологии. 2022. Vol. 68, № 3. P. 86–92.Suzuki J. et al. Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring‐derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Int. 2021. Vol. 63, № 2. P. 154–159.Suzuki J. et al. Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring‐derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Int. 2021. Vol. 63, № 2. P. 154–159.Urakami T. et al. Frequent scanning using flash glucose monitoring contributes to better glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // J. Diabetes Investig. 2022. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 185–190.Urakami T. et al. Frequent scanning using flash glucose monitoring contributes to better glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // J. Diabetes Investig. 2022. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 185–190.Boucher S.E. et al. Effect of 6 months’ flash glucose monitoring in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control: managing diabetes in a “flash” randomised controlled trial protocol // BMC Endocr. Disord. 2019. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 50.Boucher S.E. et al. Effect of 6 months’ flash glucose monitoring in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control: managing diabetes in a “flash” randomised controlled trial protocol // BMC Endocr. Disord. 2019. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 50.Heinemann L. et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial // The Lancet. 2018. Vol. 391, № 10128. P. 1367–1377.Heinemann L. et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial // The Lancet. 2018. Vol. 391, № 10128. P. 1367–1377.van Beers C.A.J. et al. Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial // Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 893–902.van Beers C.A.J. et al. Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial // Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 893–902.Choudhary P. et al. Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Significantly Reduces Severe Hypoglycemia in Hypoglycemia-Unaware Patients With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 4160–4162.Choudhary P. et al. Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Significantly Reduces Severe Hypoglycemia in Hypoglycemia-Unaware Patients With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 4160–4162.Messer L.H. et al. Basal‐IQ technology in the real world: satisfaction and reduction of diabetes burden in individuals with type 1 diabetes // Diabet. Med. 2021. Vol. 38, № 6. P. e14381.Messer L.H. et al. Basal‐IQ technology in the real world: satisfaction and reduction of diabetes burden in individuals with type 1 diabetes // Diabet. Med. 2021. Vol. 38, № 6. P. e14381.Müller L. et al. Reducing Hypoglycemia in the Real World: A Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Technology in an Ambulatory Insulin-Dependent Cohort // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2019. Vol. 21, № 9. P. 478–484.Müller L. et al. Reducing Hypoglycemia in the Real World: A Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Technology in an Ambulatory Insulin-Dependent Cohort // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2019. Vol. 21, № 9. P. 478–484.Pinsker J.E. et al. Real-World Improvements in Hypoglycemia in an Insulin-Dependent Cohort With Diabetes Mellitus Pre/Post Tandem Basal-Iq Technology Remote Software Update // Endocr. Pract. 2020. Vol. 26, № 7. P. 714–721.Pinsker J.E. et al. Real-World Improvements in Hypoglycemia in an Insulin-Dependent Cohort With Diabetes Mellitus Pre/Post Tandem Basal-Iq Technology Remote Software Update // Endocr. Pract. 2020. Vol. 26, № 7. P. 714–721.Forlenza G.P. et al. Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Reduces Hypoglycemia in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Type 1 Diabetes in an At-Home Randomized Crossover Study: Results of the PROLOG Trial // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 10. P. 2155–2161.Forlenza G.P. et al. Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Reduces Hypoglycemia in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Type 1 Diabetes in an At-Home Randomized Crossover Study: Results of the PROLOG Trial // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 10. P. 2155–2161.Bergenstal R.M. et al. Safety of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes // JAMA. 2016. Vol. 316, № 13. P. 1407.Bergenstal R.M. et al. Safety of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes // JAMA. 2016. Vol. 316, № 13. P. 1407.Carlson A.L. et al. Safety and Glycemic Outcomes During the MiniMedTM Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Pivotal Trial in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2022. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 178–189.Carlson A.L. et al. Safety and Glycemic Outcomes During the MiniMedTM Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Pivotal Trial in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2022. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 178–189.Brown S.A. et al. Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2021. Vol. 44, № 7. P. 1630–1640.Brown S.A. et al. Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2021. Vol. 44, № 7. P. 1630–1640.Von Dem Berge T. et al. In‐home use of a hybrid closed loop achieves time‐in‐range targets in preschoolers and school children: Results from a randomized, controlled, crossover trial // Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2022. Vol. 24, № 7. P. 1319–1327.Von Dem Berge T. et al. In‐home use of a hybrid closed loop achieves time‐in‐range targets in preschoolers and school children: Results from a randomized, controlled, crossover trial // Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2022. Vol. 24, № 7. P. 1319–1327.Forlenza G.P. et al. Glycemic outcomes of children 2–6 years of age with type 1 diabetes during the pediatric MINIMED TM 670G system trial // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 324–329.Forlenza G.P. et al. Glycemic outcomes of children 2–6 years of age with type 1 diabetes during the pediatric MINIMED TM 670G system trial // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 324–329.DAFNE Study Group. Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with Type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomized controlled trial // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2003. Vol. 20 Suppl 3. P. 4–5.DAFNE Study Group. Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with Type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomized controlled trial // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2003. Vol. 20 Suppl 3. P. 4–5.Hampson S.E. et al. Effects of educational and psychosocial interventions for adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review // Health Technol. Assess. Winch. Engl. 2001. Vol. 5, № 10. P. 1–79.Hampson S.E. et al. Effects of educational and psychosocial interventions for adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review // Health Technol. Assess. Winch. Engl. 2001. Vol. 5, № 10. P. 1–79.Smart C.E. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 136–154.Smart C.E. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 136–154.Mann J.I. et al. Evidence-based nutritional approaches to the treatment and prevention of diabetes mellitus // Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. NMCD. 2004. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 373–394.Mann J.I. et al. Evidence-based nutritional approaches to the treatment and prevention of diabetes mellitus // Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. NMCD. 2004. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 373–394.Delahanty L.M. et al. Association of diet with glycated hemoglobin during intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial // Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009. Vol. 89, № 2. P. 518–524.Delahanty L.M. et al. Association of diet with glycated hemoglobin during intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial // Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009. Vol. 89, № 2. P. 518–524.Bell K.J. et al. Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose control in type 1 diabetes: implications for intensive diabetes management in the continuous glucose monitoring era // Diabetes Care. 2015. Vol. 38, № 6. P. 1008–1015.Bell K.J. et al. Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose control in type 1 diabetes: implications for intensive diabetes management in the continuous glucose monitoring era // Diabetes Care. 2015. Vol. 38, № 6. P. 1008–1015.Nansel T.R., Lipsky L.M., Liu A. Greater diet quality is associated with more optimal glycemic control in a longitudinal study of youth with type 1 diabetes // Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016. Vol. 104, № 1. P. 81–87.Nansel T.R., Lipsky L.M., Liu A. Greater diet quality is associated with more optimal glycemic control in a longitudinal study of youth with type 1 diabetes // Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016. Vol. 104, № 1. P. 81–87.Paterson M.A. et al. Increasing the protein quantity in a meal results in dose-dependent effects on postprandial glucose levels in individuals with Type 1 diabetes mellitus // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2017. Vol. 34, № 6. P. 851–854.Paterson M.A. et al. Increasing the protein quantity in a meal results in dose-dependent effects on postprandial glucose levels in individuals with Type 1 diabetes mellitus // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2017. Vol. 34, № 6. P. 851–854.Smart C.E.M. et al. Both Dietary Protein and Fat Increase Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Children With Type 1 Diabetes, and the Effect Is Additive // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 3897–3902.Smart C.E.M. et al. Both Dietary Protein and Fat Increase Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Children With Type 1 Diabetes, and the Effect Is Additive // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 3897–3902.Pańkowska E., Błazik M., Groele L. Does the Fat-Protein Meal Increase Postprandial Glucose Level in Type 1 Diabetes Patients on Insulin Pump: The Conclusion of a Randomized Study // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2012. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 16–22.Pańkowska E., Błazik M., Groele L. Does the Fat-Protein Meal Increase Postprandial Glucose Level in Type 1 Diabetes Patients on Insulin Pump: The Conclusion of a Randomized Study // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2012. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 16–22.Cameron F. et al. Lessons from the Hvidoere International Study Group on childhood diabetes: be dogmatic about outcome and flexible in approach: Hvidoere group studies // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2013. Vol. 14, № 7. P. 473–480.Cameron F. et al. Lessons from the Hvidoere International Study Group on childhood diabetes: be dogmatic about outcome and flexible in approach: Hvidoere group studies // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2013. Vol. 14, № 7. P. 473–480.Quirk H. et al. Physical activity interventions in children and young people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2014. Vol. 31, № 10. P. 1163–1173.Quirk H. et al. Physical activity interventions in children and young people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2014. Vol. 31, № 10. P. 1163–1173.MacMillan F. et al. A systematic review of physical activity and sedentary behavior intervention studies in youth with type 1 diabetes: study characteristics, intervention design, and efficacy // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2014. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 175–189.MacMillan F. et al. A systematic review of physical activity and sedentary behavior intervention studies in youth with type 1 diabetes: study characteristics, intervention design, and efficacy // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2014. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 175–189.Jamiołkowska-Sztabkowska M. et al. Regular physical activity as a physiological factor contributing to extend partial remission time in children with new onset diabetes mellitus-Two years observation // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2020. Vol. 21, № 5. P. 800–807.Jamiołkowska-Sztabkowska M. et al. Regular physical activity as a physiological factor contributing to extend partial remission time in children with new onset diabetes mellitus-Two years observation // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2020. Vol. 21, № 5. P. 800–807.Pivovarov J.A., Taplin C.E., Riddell M.C. Current perspectives on physical activity and exercise for youth with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2015. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 242–255.Pivovarov J.A., Taplin C.E., Riddell M.C. Current perspectives on physical activity and exercise for youth with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2015. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 242–255.Tikkanen-Dolenc H. et al. Physical Activity Reduces Risk of Premature Mortality in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes With and Without Kidney Disease // Diabetes Care. 2017. Vol. 40, № 12. P. 1727–1732.Tikkanen-Dolenc H. et al. Physical Activity Reduces Risk of Premature Mortality in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes With and Without Kidney Disease // Diabetes Care. 2017. Vol. 40, № 12. P. 1727–1732.Adolfsson P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Exercise in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 205–226.Adolfsson P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Exercise in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 205–226.Young V. et al. Eating problems in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2013. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 189–198.Young V. et al. Eating problems in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2013. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 189–198.Kongkaew C. et al. Depression and adherence to treatment in diabetic children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies // Eur. J. Pediatr. 2014. Vol. 173, № 2. P. 203–212.Kongkaew C. et al. Depression and adherence to treatment in diabetic children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies // Eur. J. Pediatr. 2014. Vol. 173, № 2. P. 203–212.Шашель В.А., Черняк И.Ю. Комплексное восстановительное лечение детей, больных сахарным диабетом 1-го типа, в санаторно-курортных условиях. 2011. № 4. P. 30–32.Шашель В.А., Черняк И.Ю. Комплексное восстановительное лечение детей, больных сахарным диабетом 1-го типа, в санаторно-курортных условиях. 2011. № 4. P. 30–32.Лагунова et al. State of the adaptive-compensatory mechanisms in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and its changes after sanatorium-resort treatment // J. New Med. Technol. EJournal. 2014. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 0–0.Лагунова et al. State of the adaptive-compensatory mechanisms in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and its changes after sanatorium-resort treatment // J. New Med. Technol. EJournal. 2014. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 0–0.Pihoker C. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 84–104.Pihoker C. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 84–104.Shah A.C., Badawy S.M. Telemedicine in Pediatrics: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials // JMIR Pediatr. Parent. 2021. Vol. 4, № 1. P. e22696.Shah A.C., Badawy S.M. Telemedicine in Pediatrics: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials // JMIR Pediatr. Parent. 2021. Vol. 4, № 1. P. e22696.Lee S.W.H., Ooi L., Lai Y.K. Telemedicine for the Management of Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies // Front. Pharmacol. 2017. Vol. 8. P. 330.Lee S.W.H., Ooi L., Lai Y.K. Telemedicine for the Management of Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies // Front. Pharmacol. 2017. Vol. 8. P. 330.Faruque L.I. et al. Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials // Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2017. Vol. 189, № 9. P. E341–E364.Faruque L.I. et al. Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials // Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2017. Vol. 189, № 9. P. E341–E364.Cho Y.H. et al. Microvascular complications assessment in adolescents with 2- to 5-yr duration of type 1 diabetes from 1990 to 2006 // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 8. P. 682–689.Cho Y.H. et al. Microvascular complications assessment in adolescents with 2- to 5-yr duration of type 1 diabetes from 1990 to 2006 // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 8. P. 682–689.Bjornstad P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1432–1450.Bjornstad P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1432–1450.Chiang J.L. et al. Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 9. P. 2026–2044.Chiang J.L. et al. Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 9. P. 2026–2044.Donaghue K.C. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 262–274.Donaghue K.C. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 262–274.Sivaprasad S. et al. Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial // Lancet Lond. Engl. 2017. Vol. 389, № 10085. P. 2193–2203.Sivaprasad S. et al. Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial // Lancet Lond. Engl. 2017. Vol. 389, № 10085. P. 2193–2203.Stahl A. et al. Ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW): an open-label randomised controlled trial // Lancet Lond. Engl. 2019. Vol. 394, № 10208. P. 1551–1559.Stahl A. et al. Ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW): an open-label randomised controlled trial // Lancet Lond. Engl. 2019. Vol. 394, № 10208. P. 1551–1559.Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В. Осложнения сахарного диабета: лечение и профилактика. Москва: МИА, 2017. 743 p.Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В. Осложнения сахарного диабета: лечение и профилактика. Москва: МИА, 2017. 743 p.de Boer I.H., DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Kidney disease and related findings in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study. // Diabetes Care. 2014. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 24–30.de Boer I.H., DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Kidney disease and related findings in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study. // Diabetes Care. 2014. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 24–30.Fox C.S. et al. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis. // Lancet. 2012. Vol. 380, № 9854. P. 1662–1673.Fox C.S. et al. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis. // Lancet. 2012. Vol. 380, № 9854. P. 1662–1673.National Kidney Foundation. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease // Kidney Int Suppl. 2013. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 1–150.National Kidney Foundation. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease // Kidney Int Suppl. 2013. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 1–150.Stevens P.E., Levin A., Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline // Ann. Intern. Med. 2013. Vol. 158, № 11. P. 825–830.Stevens P.E., Levin A., Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline // Ann. Intern. Med. 2013. Vol. 158, № 11. P. 825–830.Schwartz G.J. et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN. 2009. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 629–637.Schwartz G.J. et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN. 2009. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 629–637.Schwartz G.J., Work D.F. Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents // Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN. 2009. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 1832–1843.Schwartz G.J., Work D.F. Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents // Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN. 2009. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 1832–1843.Copeland K.C. et al. Characteristics of Adolescents and Youth with Recent-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY Cohort at Baseline // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011. Vol. 96, № 1. P. 159–167.Copeland K.C. et al. Characteristics of Adolescents and Youth with Recent-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY Cohort at Baseline // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011. Vol. 96, № 1. P. 159–167.TODAY Study Group. Rapid Rise in Hypertension and Nephropathy in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY clinical trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1735–1741.TODAY Study Group. Rapid Rise in Hypertension and Nephropathy in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY clinical trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1735–1741.American Diabetes Association. 10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S105–S118.American Diabetes Association. 10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S105–S118.Cook J. et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy to decrease microalbuminuria in normotensive children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus // J. Pediatr. 1990. Vol. 117, № 1. P. 39–45.Cook J. et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy to decrease microalbuminuria in normotensive children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus // J. Pediatr. 1990. Vol. 117, № 1. P. 39–45.Rudberg S. et al. Enalapril reduces microalbuminuria in young normotensive Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients irrespective of its hypotensive effect // Diabetologia. 1990. Vol. 33, № 8. P. 470–476.Rudberg S. et al. Enalapril reduces microalbuminuria in young normotensive Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients irrespective of its hypotensive effect // Diabetologia. 1990. Vol. 33, № 8. P. 470–476.Soffer B. et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of lisinopril for children with hypertension // Am. J. Hypertens. 2003. Vol. 16, № 10. P. 795–800.Soffer B. et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of lisinopril for children with hypertension // Am. J. Hypertens. 2003. Vol. 16, № 10. P. 795–800.Catalá-López F. et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes of Renin–Angiotensin System Blockade in Adult Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analyses // PLOS Med. / ed. Taal M.W. 2016. Vol. 13, № 3. P. e1001971.Catalá-López F. et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes of Renin–Angiotensin System Blockade in Adult Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analyses // PLOS Med. / ed. Taal M.W. 2016. Vol. 13, № 3. P. e1001971.Fröhlich-Reiterer E. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1451–1467.Fröhlich-Reiterer E. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1451–1467.Wolfsdorf J.I. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 155–177.Wolfsdorf J.I. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 155–177.Abraham M.B. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 178–192.Abraham M.B. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 178–192.Tinti D., Rabbone I. Mini-doses of glucagon to prevent hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes refusing food: a case series // Acta Diabetol. 2019.Tinti D., Rabbone I. Mini-doses of glucagon to prevent hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes refusing food: a case series // Acta Diabetol. 2019.Shun C.B. et al. Thyroid autoimmunity in Type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2014. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 126–135.Shun C.B. et al. Thyroid autoimmunity in Type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2014. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 126–135.Wang J. et al. Association of autoimmune thyroid disease with type 1 diabetes mellitus and its ultrasonic diagnosis and management // World J. Diabetes. 2024. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 348–360.Wang J. et al. Association of autoimmune thyroid disease with type 1 diabetes mellitus and its ultrasonic diagnosis and management // World J. Diabetes. 2024. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 348–360.Mahmud F.H. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 275–286.Mahmud F.H. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 275–286.Pham-Short A. et al. Screening for Celiac Disease in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review // PEDIATRICS. 2015. Vol. 136, № 1. P. e170–e176.Pham-Short A. et al. Screening for Celiac Disease in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review // PEDIATRICS. 2015. Vol. 136, № 1. P. e170–e176.Samara-Boustani D. et al. High prevalence of hirsutism and menstrual disorders in obese adolescent girls and adolescent girls with type 1 diabetes mellitus despite different hormonal profiles // Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2012. Vol. 166, № 2. P. 307–316.Samara-Boustani D. et al. High prevalence of hirsutism and menstrual disorders in obese adolescent girls and adolescent girls with type 1 diabetes mellitus despite different hormonal profiles // Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2012. Vol. 166, № 2. P. 307–316.Regnell S.E., Lernmark A. Hepatic Steatosis in Type 1 Diabetes // Rev. Diabet. Stud. 2011. Vol. 8, № 4. P. 454–467.Regnell S.E., Lernmark A. Hepatic Steatosis in Type 1 Diabetes // Rev. Diabet. Stud. 2011. Vol. 8, № 4. P. 454–467.Abdallah H.R. et al. Clinical and diagnostic characteristics of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among Egyptian children and adolescents with type1 diabetes // Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2023. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 52.Abdallah H.R. et al. Clinical and diagnostic characteristics of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among Egyptian children and adolescents with type1 diabetes // Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2023. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 52.Teasdale G., Jennett B. ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS // The Lancet. 1974. Vol. 304, № 7872. P. 81–84.Teasdale G., Jennett B. ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS // The Lancet. 1974. Vol. 304, № 7872. P. 81–84.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.